Wood Truss Design 2

CSEF · 2003 Structural Capability & Strength of Materials (Junior Division Only)

Overview

Objectives/Goals To determine if the Warren with post truss is stronger than the Pratt Truss? Methods/Materials Wooden box/Test station. Douglas fir/Glue/Small nails-brads/Weights/Dial Indicator/Hammer/Brad nailer/Sand paper/Exacto knife/Saw/Camera Procedure 1) Build four different truss designs. a) Truss 1: Pratt truss design. b) Truss 2: Warren with Post truss design. c) Truss 3: Warren with loaded posts truss design. d) Truss 4: Reinforced Warren with loaded posts truss design. 2) Build a test platform. 3) Test three off each truss design. 4) Draw conclusions and make recommendations for each truss design. Compare test results to the analysis of each truss. Comment on how each truss failed. Results I have observed that my conclusions from last years project were not completely correct. Last year the Pratt truss was stronger than the Warren with posts truss. After loading the truss more evenly with the new and improved truss-loading platform, the two trusses are very nearly the same strength. The Warren with posts truss (T2) tested slightly stronger than the Pratt truss (T1). Truss # 3, the Warren with posts truss (minus the posts which do not support weight) tested to be the same strength of the Warren with all posts truss. Truss #4 was very cool. It was built with extra boards at the weak points. It supported a lot more load than the other trusses. Conclusions/Discussion My hypothesis was correct. The Warren with posts truss was stronger than the Pratt truss design. The vertical members tied to the diagonal members forming triangles really increased the strength of the trusses. Keeping the trusses rigid made them strong, the triangular configurations of truss members were able to resist the compressive and tension stresses found in the truss members.

Summary statement

Testing Wood Truss Designs to determine which truss will support the most mass over span.

Help received

I would like to thank my dad for helping me build my project, my mom for helping me put my board together, Mr. Ajit Randava for his help when I interviewed him, and my teacher for letting me do the project.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2003 Structural Capability & Strength of Materials (Junior Division Only) · Entry J1802

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google