Demolishing Bridges
CSEF · 2006 Structural Capability & Strength of Materials (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective is to see whether the Pratt truss will hold more weight then the Warren design. Methods/Materials I used 3/16 wooden dowels, cut them into lengths of 2 inches, 27/8 inches and 4inches. I also used Elmer's carpenter's wood glue and used pliers to cut the wood. Once i was done I had a three dimensional bridge with two sides braced together. Results My results were simple. I only did one test. The Pratt design held 65 pounds, the Warren design held 33 pounds. Conclusions/Discussion I studied two types of bridges, the Warren design and the Pratt design. I built both of them to see how much weight they could hold. I put the weight on the middle of the trusses.The Pratt design held more weight than the Warren design.
Summary statement
I tested the Pratt and the Warren design trusses to see which would hold the most weight.
Help received
Santigo Espinoza Jr.
Competition history
- CSEF 2006
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2005
Which Truss Do You Trust?
CSEF · 2006
The Effect of Bridge Design on Bridge Weight Bearing Capacity
CSEF · 2006
In Bridges We Truss
CSEF · 2004
Truss Bridge's Arch Enemy
CSEF · 2008
Bridges: Which Design Is Best?
CSEF · 2002
Bridges: A Comparison of Structural Capabilities
CSEF · 2003
Wood Truss Design 2
CSEF · 2009
What Bridge Design Is Strongest?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects