Which Truss Do You Trust?

CSEF · 2005 Structural Capability & Strength of Materials (Junior Division Only)

Overview

Objectives/Goals Objective: The objective of this project is to evaluate which truss bridge design will hold more weight, the Pratt or the Warren design. My hypothesis is that if I put weight on two model bridges, one constructed as a Warren truss bridge and the other built as a Pratt truss bridge, then the Pratt truss will hold the most weight. I think the Pratt truss will hold more weight based on research I did which said it was stronger and because the Pratt model has more trusses on it. Methods/Materials Materials and Methods: The first step I did for this project was to research truss bridges and collect materials including popsicle sticks, balsa wood, glue and clamps. Using these materials I constructed trusses 24 inches long based on two different designs. Next I connected two of the same trusses one popsicle stick apart and glued a two foot piece of balsa wood in the middle of the trusses making the bridge platform. Then I piled two stacks of books the same height, put a bridge on top of the two stacks so that there was one inch of each end of the bridge on each of the two stacks. Finally I put weights on the middle of the span for each bridge. Using a digital camera, I took pictures of every addition of weight and collected my data. Results Result: The results of my experiment support my hypothesis that the Pratt design would be stronger then the Warren design. The Pratt design held sixteen more pounds before it collapsed then the Warren did. The Pratt held forty-two pounds compared to the Warren which held twenty-six before collapsing. Conclusions/Discussion Conclusion: My conclusion is that the Pratt truss held more weight then the Warren truss because the Pratt design has more trusses. This makes it better able to withstand additional stress.

Summary statement

Two model truss bridges, one built as a Pratt truss the other built as a Warren truss, were compared to see which one could withstand the most weight.

Help received

Dad helped purchase materials and supervised construction; Mom proofed my final content.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2005 Structural Capability & Strength of Materials (Junior Division Only) · Entry J1804

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google