Tennis Shock Absorbers: Bad Vibes?
CSEF · 2014 Product Science (Physical) (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals Objective/Goals: Tennis players worldwide use tennis shock absorbers. They believe that a reduction in racket vibrations help them play better. But do the shock absorbers actually absorb the vibrations? This experiment has tested multiple racquets and absorbers in order to see if the absorbers reduce vibrations significantly. Methods/Materials Methods/Materials: The experiments used 3 different tennis racquets and shock absorbers, a tennis ball machine, and a program called Praat. Each shock absorber was made of different materials. In order to test the vibration, he sounds of the balls impact of the racquet were recorded and run through Praat to get their frequency readings. Each racquet was tested once without the shock absorber, and three times with. There#s a repetition of 25 balls per absorber. Results Results: There were a total of 300 measurements, and 100 per racquet. When the racquets were tested without a shock absorber, the sound intensity had ranged from 3500 Hz to 3900 Hz Shock absorber #1 had dropped the intensity by about 100 Hz # 150 Hz, Shock absorber #2 had dropped it from 175 Hz to 250 Hz, and shock absorber #3 had the intensity drop approximately 200 Hz to 325 Hz Conclusions/Discussion Conclusions/discussions: Based off this data I can conclude that the Commercial shock absorbers could not absorb any significant amount of vibrations, and that the original hypothesis was incorrect. The hypothesis had predicted 60% drop in vibration, but the data has shown there to be a 14% drop in vibration. This was not a lot of vibrations, and it shows that the absorbers may not be useful to the player. i can also conclude that rubber is the best material of the three to dampen vibrations with. Also, it is possible the racquet could affect the absorbers usefulness.
Summary statement
It is about whether or nor tennis shock absorbers work.
Help received
Mom helped with report; Dad helped with testing; ;Bob Sandler for loaning a ball machine
Competition history
- CSEF 2014
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2009
It's Shocking!
CSEF · 2019
Shock Absorption: Can You Feel It?
CSEF · 2009
Tennis Ball Bounciness Experiment: Does the Brand of Tennis Ball Affect How Bouncy It Is?
CSEF · 2008
The Effect of Varied Tennis String Tension on the Coefficient of Restitution
CSEF · 2011
A Study of How Different Forms of Base Isolation Affect the Maximum Acceleration of a Structure during Seismic Activity
CSEF · 2008
Tennis String Stretching
CSEF · 2010
Sound Absorption Characteristics
CSEF · 2006
Don't Be Swayed: A Study of the Dampening Abilities of Viscous Dampers in Buildings
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects