Sound Absorption Characteristics
CSEF · 2010 Materials Science (Junior Division Only) Fourth Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals I came up with this idea on the way to school when my sister was yelling at me. I wondered what material I could wrap her in that would block the most sound. I also have a relative that is legally hard-of-hearing because of his exposure to jet engine noise. Methods/Materials With the help of my grandpa, we attached an oscillator (frequency generator) and an alternating current volt meter to a speaker that was held in place by a cardboard box and styrofoam. We changed the frequency levels of the input from 50-15,000 cycles. For every material, the input signal was set at 2 volts. This made sure that all the frequencies we tested were tested at the same amplitude. We attached a microphone above the speaker in a second cardboard box. The microphone was attached to a pre-amplifier. We then placed the test material between the microphone and the speaker for each test frequency. We recorded the voltage with and without (always 2 volts) the test material. To convert the voltage readings to decibels we used the formula: dB = 20 * Log10( volt with / volt without ) Results All materials tested showed unique results. We tested seven different materials; acoustical tile, double pane glass, speaker cover, single pane glass, tapestry cloth, cardboard and printer paper. The double pane glass blocked sound the best overall. At different frequencies, some materials absorbed sound better than others. Surprisingly, at a few points, some of the materials like cardboard and printer paper resonated carrying the sound closer to the microphone resulting in a voltage measurement that surpassed that of the input voltage. Conclusions/Discussion All the materials tested reduced the sound level at most points. Because the double pane glass reduced the sound level more than any other material tested my hypothesis was proven correct. I was surprised that at some frequencies, the material resonated and made the voltage appear to be greater than the voltage without the material. I was also surprised that the speaker covering was not completely transparent. It blocked the sound a little bit at some points.
Summary statement
Sound levels can be reduced more effectively by some materials than others at different frequencies.
Help received
used equipment belonging to and under supervision of grandfather, George Taylor retired engineer
Awards (1)
Competition history
- CSEF 2010
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2016
The Effect of Material on Sound Absorption
CSEF · 2013
A Study of Decibel Reduction as Sound Passes through Common Materials
CSEF · 2014
Acoustic Insulation: Propagation and Reflection of Sound Waves of Various Frequencies for Different Materials
CSEF · 2010
Keep it Quiet! Which Materials Block Sound Transmission Most Effectively?
CSEF · 2011
Sound Barriers
CSEF · 2006
Where Did the Sound Go? A Study in Sound Absorption
CSEF · 2016
Sound Extermination
CSEF · 2002
Assessing the Ability of Various Materials to Absorb Sound
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects