Over or Under
CSEF · 2005 Structural Capability & Strength of Materials (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals The goal is to determine whether an overhead Warren truss bridge or an underhead Warren truss bridge is capable of holding more weight. Methods/Materials Aircraft grade western spruce and three-ply plywood were used to construct four identical Warren trusses. Two of the trusses were tested upright and two were tested upside down. Bricks were applied evenly on the bridges until they collapsed. Results The overhead truss bridges held more weight than the underhead truss bridges. The first overhead truss held 225.5 pounds and the second held 258.5 pounds. The first underhead truss held 181.5 pounds and the second held 214.5 pounds. Conclusions/Discussion The research conducted on this subject showed that the underhead Warren truss bridge should have held more weight, but the tests results showed that the overhead truss bridge consistently held 44 pounds more than the underhead truss. The results were suprising but gave an obvious answer to the question: the overhead Warren truss bridge can hold more weight than the underhead Warren truss bridge.
Summary statement
I set out to discover whether an overhead Warren truss bridge or an underhead Warren truss bridge could hold more weight.
Help received
Father supplied construction materials and gave advise on contruction of bridges.
Competition history
- CSEF 2005
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2006
The Effect of Bridge Design on Bridge Weight Bearing Capacity
CSEF · 2006
In Bridges We Truss
CSEF · 2005
Which Truss Do You Trust?
CSEF · 2008
Bridges: Which Design Is Best?
CSEF · 2002
Bridges: A Comparison of Structural Capabilities
CSEF · 2004
Truss Bridge's Arch Enemy
CSEF · 2006
Demolishing Bridges
CSEF · 2006
Bridge the Gap!
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects