Does Method of Delivery of Chemotherapy Affect Cancer Cell Death?
CSEF · 2008 Pharmacology/ Toxicology
Overview
Objectives/Goals Introduction: In 2008, approximately 142,070 Californians will be diagnosed with cancer. Most will receive expensive intravenous chemotherapy, which causes harmful side effects. If locally injecting chemotherapy into a tumor is effective in causing cell death, systemic side effects may be reduced, and costs lowered. Problem: Is delivering chemotherapy to a cancer sample by direct injection as effective as delivering the same chemotherapy, in the same dose, to an identical sample by passive diffusion? Methods/Materials Thirteen cancer specimens were divided into 3 or 5 equal samples, depending on availability. One sample was fixed in formalin, another injected with chemotherapy, and one exposed to the same chemotherapy in R.P.M.I. solution (diffusion). Where 5 samples were available, one was injected without chemotherapy, and one was placed in R.P.M.I. solution without chemotherapy (negative controls). The tissues were then processed for microscopic examination. Five indicators of cell damage and life cycle disruption were evaluated: mitoses, pyknosis, tissue necrosis, chromatin streaks, and tissue tears. Results were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in mitoses, pyknosis, or necrosis between the formalin-fixed and negative control samples. Comparing chemotherapy treated samples, there was no significant difference in mitoses for injection versus diffusion. Pyknosis and necrosis were greater in the injection samples. Chromatin streaks and tissue tears were seen almost exclusively in samples treated by injection, with or without chemotherapy. Conclusions/Discussion Delivering chemotherapy to cancer samples by injection causes greater nuclear pyknosis, tissue necrosis, chromatin streaking, and tissue tearing than chemotherapy delivered by diffusion. This study has confirmed the hypothesis that chemotherapy delivered by injection is at least as effective as chemotherapy delivered by diffusion.
Summary statement
The efficacy of delivery of chemotherapy by direct injection into a cancer sample was compared with the efficacy of delivering the same chemotherapy to an identical cancer sample by passive diffusion.
Help received
Grossmont Hospital Surgical Pathology Laboratory was the site of all testing under supervision of Scienctific advisor Dr. Mair (Surgical Pathologist at Grossmont Hosptial); Scientific Consultants: Medical Onocologists Drs. Clune, Zu, and Bodkin; Oncologic Pharmacist at Grossmont Cancer Center.
Competition history
- CSEF 2008
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2005
In Vitro Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Anti-Angiogenic Cancer Therapies on Human Tumor Cells
CSEF · 2012
A Novel Configuration of Carbon Nanotubes to Selectively Target Chemotherapy-Resistant Cancer Stem Cells
CSEF · 2011
Treatment of Simulated Cancer Cells with Compton Scattering-Produced Secondary Radiation
CSEF · 2019
Do Antioxidants Prevent Chemotherapy Cell Toxicity?
ISEF · 2022
The Introduction of Excess Calcium in Cancer Cells
CSEF · 2006
Biodegradable Nanoparticles: A Novel Approach to Chemotherapy
ISEF · 2017
The Effect of Nutrient Levels on Chemotherapeutic Drug Efficacy in NCI-H460, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Cells
CSEF · 2002
A Novel Cancer Killing Strategy: Direct Protein Delivery of Caspase-3
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects