What Does a Simple, Low-cost, 3D-printed Design for an Automated Robotic Prosthetic Look Like (Phases 1b, II, and III)?

CSEF · 2018 Applied Mechanics & Structures Honorable_mention Award

Overview

Objectives/Goals Using commercially-available software, hardware, and components, a simple 3D-printed design for a robotic hand will be created. In Phase I of the design (a previous project), a typical 3D printer and software were used to generate, optimize, and print a child-sized model hand. In Phase II, a significantly improved 3D-printed model (Phase Ib) will be fitted with robotic parts such that the hand will function with individual finger movements. Finally, in Phase III, the robotic hand will be retrofitted with automation in order to direct the hand's activities using computer commands. Ultimately, the prosthetic should be able to perform simple tasks, such as gripping an object, picking up an object, and sequenced movements of the fingers. Methods/Materials In Phase Ib, commercially-available software and hardware were used to substantially optimize the previous 3D-printed design (from Phase I) for a robotic hand to fit a child. The Phase Ib design allowed the hand to open and close more completely and easily. In Phase II, the improved hand was fitted with parts such that it functioned mechanically with individual finger movements. In Phase III, the prosthetic was fitted with automation parts in order to direct the hand's activities using computer commands. Results Once CAD designs were modified or created for each of the parts needed to 3D-print the significantly improved model, and after all robotic and automation components were selected and tested, the individual items needed to build the entire hand were recorded (cost per unit), along with time to print the 3D-printed parts. Total cost and total time were calculated based on the number of each item needed. As proposed in the hypothesis/solution and as required by the design constraints, total material costs for this automated robotic hand were low ($72.39 if not commercially printed). Total time to print all 3D-printed parts was 36.3 hours. Conclusions/Discussion The prosthetic functioned automatically with individual finger movements. Automated movements for simple tasks such as grabbing and pinching (picking up an object) were achieved. Phases Ib, II, and III resulted in a low-cost and effective design solution. The overall design requirements for the automated, robotic prosthetic were achieved, although the designed hand had much more range of possible movement than currently occurred using the selected servo motors.

Summary statement

I designed, built, and tested a functioning, child-sized robotic prosthetic using CAD software, 3D-printing, mechanical parts, and automation hardware and software.

Help received

Dr. Alexa Alborzi of Alborzi Orthodontics donated orthodontic elastic bands. A staff member at Turner's Outdoorsman in Fountain Valley, CA, provided his knowledge and donated microfilament fishing line. Sean Kilmer at Maker Tree 3D provided support and quick turnaround time for commercial 3D-printing.

Awards (1)

  • Honorable Mention

Competition history

  • CSEF 2018 Applied Mechanics & Structures · Entry J0308

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google