Use Your Head(land)! An Experiment in Shore Protection
CSEF · 2003 Earth Sciences/ Planetary Sciences/ Physical Environments
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective of this project was to determine whether a man-made headland could rival the effectiveness of a groin in protecting the shoreline, but maintain a more natural setting. Methods/Materials The experiment was conducted in a 1.2 m x 2.4 m rectangular wave basin. Three tests were run: an unprotected beach, a beach with a conventional groin, and a beach with an experimental, triangular headland. The horizontal scale was 1:400 and the vertical scale was 1:80 (5:1 distorted scale). Each test consisted of 6,000 waves run in sets of 60 to prevent recirculation. The wave height was 3 cm and the period was 0.42 seconds. The water depth was 7.6 cm. The slope of the beach was 1 on 6, which equals a 1 on 30 prototype slope. To measure changes in the beach, eleven profiles were surveyed before and after each test from the back of the beach to the toe. Results The test results indicated that the groin trapped the most sand. Not many sand grains were able to pass around the end, and a large bar formed on its updrift side. However, since the groin trapped so much sand, it starved the downdrift beach. The headland did a better job of regulating sediment movement. It did not starve the downdrift beach, because it did not block as much sediment. It caused a large, symmetrical bar to develop on its updrift and downdrift sides. Conclusions/Discussion The experiment demonstrated that a man-made headland can rival the effectiveness of a groin in protecting the shoreline. Although a groin protects the beach on the updrift side, it causes erosion on the downdrift side. A headland is not as effective on the updrift side, but provides more equal protection for the entire beach.
Summary statement
This project compares the effectiveness of different methods of protecting the shoreline.
Help received
Prof. R. Wiegel (U.C. Berkeley) and Prof. W. McDougal (Univ. of Fla.) offered suggestions for literature, preliminary tests, and design of the wave basin. Mr. G.E. Hearon answered questions about the results, and provided guidance on graphing beach profiles. My father assisted in constructing the wave basin.
Awards (1)
- Category Award
Competition history
- CSEF 2003
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2003
Reef to the Rescue: Which Artificial Surfing Reef Counteracts Beach Erosion Best?
ISEF · 2021
Stable Shores: An Experimental Set-Up to Test Economical Alternatives to Conventional Coastal Erosion Control
CSEF · 2008
Dune Heroes
CSEF · 2005
The Effect of Jetties on Sand Deposition
CSEF · 2019
Sweet Erosion: Analyzing Coastal Erosion Prevention Methods
CSEF · 2013
Investigating Wave Barriers to Reduce the Power of Storm Surges
CSEF · 2016
Save Our Beaches: Man-Made vs. Natural Erosion Prevention Solutions
CSEF · 2002
Taming Tidal Waves
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects