To Drink or Not to Drink: A Comparison of Arsenic Levels and Water Quality in Europe and the United States
CSEF · 2015 Environmental Science
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective of this experiment was to compare the waters of Europe and United States to the World Health Organization standardized guidelines, and to determine which one is superior in quality and hence safer for consumption. The experiment will involve the testing of the waters of both areas for arsenic, bromine, free chlorine, total chlorine, pH, alkalinity, total hardness, nitrates and nitrites. The hypothesis was that the arsenic level in the United States water would be 3 times that of Europe. It was also predicted that the pH, nitrate and nitrite levels in Europe would be 30% closer to the lower bound of the WHO guidelines than the United States. Methods/Materials The Lovibond Arsenic Testing Kit, LaMotte Insta-Test 5 way and Nitrite and Nitrate test strips, collection bottles, timer, camera, tape, gloves, and data recording sheets were used to carry out the experiment. Three water sources were picked in each of the five European and two American cities and three samples were tested within each source. Photos were taken of the test strips after testing to document the color change and the results were logged in the data recording sheets. Results A total of 360 trials/ tests were conducted. Majority of the drinking water sources tested in the US and in Europe had similar chemical level profiles which were within the WHO guidelines. The tap water both regions tested negative for arsenic and had all the other parameters within the recommended ranges. The average arsenic level in Europe was 0.0051 mg/L while that in US was 0.0005 mg/L. However, the non-drinking sources, such as seas, oceans, lakes and rivers, contained higher levels of nitrates, nitrites, bromine, free and total chlorine. Conclusions/Discussion This experiment demonstrated that pH, nitrate, nitrite, free chlorine, total chlorine and bromine levels in the European waters were closer to the WHO guidelines than the United States#. The average arsenic level in Europe was found to be ten times higher than that of US. This led to the conclusion that although the water quality of Europe is better than that of the United States with regards to the WHO guidelines, the United States has less arsenic in its water than Europe.
Summary statement
This project is a comparison of the average arsenic levels and water quality in the United States and Europe as compared to the World Health Organization Guidelines
Help received
My mother guided in finding a mentor, in ordering supplies and in collection/testing of samples; My father planned the trip; My mentor, Ms. Patsy Schreiber answered any questions I had regarding my project
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2015
Arsenic and Water Quality in Bangladesh and America
CSEF · 2003
From Here to Maine: Is Tap Water All the Same?
CSEF · 2023
What’s in Your Water?
CSEF · 2011
What's in Our Water? A Comparison of Raw Water Quality in Three Countries
CSEF · 2005
Thirsty? What Would You Like to Drink? Well Water: Is It Healthy, or Is Bottled Water or City Water Better?
CSEF · 2006
How Clean Is Drinking Water in India?
CSEF · 2006
Water Contamination Across the Nation
ISEF · 2018
Comparing the Potentially Hazardous Chemical Components of Different Types of Drinking Water and the Dangers We Might Not Perceive
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects