Think Away: How Does Your Thinking Style Affect Your Ability to Simulate the Future?
CSEF · 2015 Behavioral & Social Sciences
Overview
Objectives/Goals My project was to determine which thinking style (Divergent (a more creative thinking style that sees many possibilities) or Convergent (a thinking style that focuses mainly on knowledge and mathematical based thinking (usually sees only the most obvious possibilities))) is better at simulating the future in the mind. I believe that the Divergent will be better at simulating the future because the Divergent can calculate more options. Methods/Materials Select 10 or more people (has to be even)(two people per game, approximately the same age, and never played Abalone before), one copy of Abalone game, one copy of the Uses of Objects Test (a test that determines your thinking style), instructions for Abalone (it can be a video). I had the subjects do the Uses of Objects Test to determine their thinking style. Then I paired the subjects up Convergent with Divergent, read off the rules of Abalone, and had them play until someone won 2 out of 3 games. I used the outcome of the games to determine which thinking style is better at thinking ahead. Results The Divergent won 60% of the time, the Convergent won 20% of the time, and the 50/50s (a thinking style that is 40-60% of one thinking style and 40-60% of the other) won the other 20%. Also, the different thinking styles would win at different times. The Divergent would usually win the first game, lose the second and win the third. The Convergent, on the other hand, would usually lose the first game, win the second and lose the third. Conclusions/Discussion My conclusion is that the Divergent are better at simulating the future. Their ability to adapt and think their way around and through problems allowed them to better calculate future risk. Also, they were able to see multiple outcomes so they had better moves than the Convergent.
Summary statement
Which thinking style (Divergent (a more creative thinking style that sees many possibilities) or Convergent (a thinking style that focuses mainly on knowledge and mathematical based thinking)) is better at simulating the future in the mind?
Help received
The guy at Marbles: the Brain Store helped me find the Abalone game, my mother helped me with funding, typing, and gluing.
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2008
Middle School Decision-Making: When Not Thinking Makes More Sense
CSEF · 2006
The Least Obvious Choice: Modified Rock-Paper-Scissors as a Testing Ground for the Human Mind
CSEF · 2016
Determining How a Person's Intuition Affects Their Ability to Thin-slice
CSEF · 2010
The Greatest Mind (Adult Version)
CSEF · 2009
Decision Making in the Face of Risk
CSEF · 2004
Spatial Reasoning Abilities: Chess Players vs. Non-Chess Players
CSEF · 2008
Cranial Confusion: How the Brain Adapts to Left-Right Inversion
CSEF · 2011
Position or Piece: Computer Simulation and Study of the Strategy Board Game Blokus
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects