The Learning Plant
Overview
Objectives/Goals In this experiment, we attempted to test the hypothesis that plants can be classically conditioned. We used the Venus flytrap as the plant specimen and its trapping response as the behavior to be conditioned. We used stroking the leaf as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and vibration of the plant as the conditioned stimulus. Methods/Materials 1. 3 Venus# Flytraps (Fully grown with leafs) 2. Massager as the source of vibration 3. Toothpicks 4. Stopwatch We conducted 4 separate experiments using different parameters for the conditioning paradigm. The experimental conditions were as follows: 1.Duration of CS for one minute with low frequency vibration 2.Duration of CS for one minute with high frequency vibration 3.Duration of CS for two minutes with low frequency vibration 4.Duration of CS for two minutes with high frequency vibration. Each of the four experiments in this research was conducted in 4 phases: Phase one: baseline assessment of plants' responsiveness to stroking the interior of the leaf with a toothpick. This was to ascertain that the Flytraps were indeed capable of trapping and were healthy. Phase two: Plants were stimulated with a massaging vibrator for a period of one (or two) minutes to assess whether there was any trapping response to vibration stimulus alone. Phase three: Coupling of the unconditional stimulus of stroking the inside of the leaf with the vibration stimulus. This was achieved by stimulating the plants with the vibrator applied to the container pot for a period of one or two minutes at high or low frequency . Midway during vibration, the individual leaves were stroked inside with a toothpick. This procedure was repeated daily for 5 consecutive days. Phase four: after the 5 day conditioning period, the leaves were stimulated by vibration alone. Results Five days following pairing of the CS with the UCS, 0/17 leaves responded to vibration stimulus in experiment 1. In experiments 2, 3 and 4, the response rates were 0/21, 0/22, and 0/22 respectively. There
Summary statement
Do Venus Flytraps have the ability to be conditioned, and therefore be able to associate a neutral stimulus with and unconditional one?
Help received
Sister gave technical assistance; Mother helped with board layout design and technical work with the board
Competition history
- CSEF 2003
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
The Effects of Classical/Pavlovian Conditioning on Dionaea muscipula
CSEF · 2015
Plant Electrophysiology: How Does the Stimulation of Trigger Hairs Affect Action Potential Generation in Venus Flytraps?
CSEF · 2014
For the Venus Flytrap, Does Food Type Affect the Speed of a Trap's Closure and the Duration of the Trap's Closed State?
CSEF · 2006
An Investigation of the Bioelectric Response of Mimosa pudica to Physical Stimuli
ISEF · 2019
The Intelligent Plant: Electrophysiology of the Venus Flytrap
CSEF · 2002
The Effect of Salt on How Venus Fly Traps Close
CSEF · 2002
Plant Tissue Culture of Dionaea muscipula: Testing Alternative Media Supportive Materials
CSEF · 2013
Does Talking to Plants in Different Tones of Voice Affect Their Growth?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects