Plant Electrophysiology: How Does the Stimulation of Trigger Hairs Affect Action Potential Generation in Venus Flytraps?
CSEF · 2015 Plant Biology Second Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals This study examined the effect of trigger hair stimulation on the generation of action potentials and their relationship to trap closure in a B52 Venus Flytrap (Dionea Muscipula). I wanted to confirm that one stimulation of a trigger hair resulted in the generation of one action potential. Additionally, two action potentials must reach the midrib within a certain period of time to initiate trap closure, but different scientists claim different durations ranging from 20 to 40 seconds, and I wanted to narrow down that range. Finally, I wanted to see what affect multiple, almost simultaneous, stimulations had upon action potential generation and trap closure. Methods/Materials B52 Venus Flytraps were germinated from seed and grown for two years. Each trap was connected via electrode gel to an Arduino board with a Plant SpikerShield, which was connected to a computer. Action potentials were gathered and recorded in the Processing 2 programming language using a plant processing sketch. Trigger hair stimulation was controlled using a linear actuator. The experiment was recorded with 3 cameras, (one running at 240fps) in order to verify and calculate results. Results It was found that one trigger hair stimulation resulted in one action potential. However, it was discovered that when two stimulations occurred within 0.229 seconds of each other, only one action potential was generated. Additionally, it was confirmed that two action potentials within 20 seconds of each other closed a trap, except in the special case noted above. Traps also closed intermittently up to 42 seconds between action potentials, suggesting that a trap begins to lose its charge after 20 seconds, and loses its charge completely after 42 seconds. Conclusions/Discussion For the next step, a better knowledge of calculus and chemistry would be required to investigate the decisive moment just before trap closure, in which there occurs a myriad of chemical and physical events that are beyond my skill set to evaluate. However, I would like to investigate how the flytrap uses its properties as an electrical storage "battery". In biotechnology, this knowledge could help scientists create a similar "battery" or operate a microcontroller in plants. Understanding how all plants use electricity could pave the way for manipulation of electrical memory in agricultural products and open new forms of electronic communication and real time feedback from crops.
Summary statement
This study examined the effect of trigger hair stimulation on the generation of action potentials and their relationship to trap closure in a B52 Venus Flytrap.
Help received
Doug Foster from LA Biohackers answered questions about modifying the SpikerShield circuitry and Timothy Marzullo from Backyard Brains answered questions about software and hardware.
Awards (1)
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
ISEF · 2019
The Intelligent Plant: Electrophysiology of the Venus Flytrap
CSEF · 2014
For the Venus Flytrap, Does Food Type Affect the Speed of a Trap's Closure and the Duration of the Trap's Closed State?
CSEF · 2026
Nitrogen Modulates Electrical Signaling and Trap Closure Kinetics in Venus Flytraps
CSEF · 2006
An Investigation of the Bioelectric Response of Mimosa pudica to Physical Stimuli
CSEF · 2003
The Learning Plant
CSEF · 2004
The Effects of Classical/Pavlovian Conditioning on Dionaea muscipula
CSEF · 2010
Effects of Electrical Stimulation on the Immediate Growth of Bean Plants
CSEF · 2002
The Effect of Salt on How Venus Fly Traps Close
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects