Surfing on Sound

CSEF · 2011 Physics & Astronomy

Overview

Objectives/Goals In today's technology, smaller processing chips & parts are needed to make functional devices. Acoustic levitation ensures that certain parts of those devices can be made in a contaminant free environment. This project was designed to test the different conditions that are best suited to levitate an object. Methods/Materials This project began by borrowing an industrial speaker & a frequency generator from NASA, which were connected to a stereo amplifier. A 1½" florescent light tube was used to focus the sound. A concave circular soap dish was mounted & used as a reflector atop a tripod in order to change the distance between the speaker and the reflector. Pieces of tissue paper, Styrofoam, & plastic were weighed and modified so that each weighed 0.5 grams. Ear buds & headphones were worn during testing. Each material was placed into the acoustic field using clamp scissors at a starting frequency of 1 kHz to 20 kHz in increments of 5 kHz. At each 5 kHz interval, volume was increased in increments from 1 to 10. A dB meter was used to gauge the dB readings for each test. Half of the tests were conducted with a reflector to create a standing wave. On tests using the reflector, the distance of the reflector was changed for each kHz because of the different wavelengths. The formula to calculate wavelengths was lambda=c/f. The formula to calculate the distance was lambda/2 x a multiple of the wavelength. A multiple of 3 was chosen, which provided the appropriate distance, in inches, to set the reflector. Results In order to quantify the data, a rating scale was developed based on consistent visible findings: #1-no movement, #2-bouncing, #3-near levitation, #4-levitation. Near levitation was defined as the material floating in a constant position, while being supported by the tube or speaker on one edge. After analyzing 600 results, the total percentage of near levitation was 11.3%, bouncing was 60.67%, & no activity was 28%. Levitation was not able to be achieved. It was noted that the materials with the greater surface area, such as the Styrofoam, were more impacted by the sound waves. Conclusions/Discussion Overall, levitation could not be reached, however. Lower frequencies such as 1 kHz, produced a better outcome, as seen by a greater number of near levitations than bounces. The creation/maintenance of a proper standing wave was difficult due to not being able to procure proper amplifying and measuring devices.

Summary statement

A Study to Determine the Effects Most Favorable for Acoustic Levitation

Help received

Larry Wright for helping us design and conduct project;Liz Wright for guidance and support;Emily Wright for help with the board;Maria Caballero for the NASA documents;Lionel Banuelos for letting us borrow a triple beam balance.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2011 Physics & Astronomy · Entry S1802

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google