Natural Antibiotics vs. Pharmaceutical Antibiotics

CSEF · 2002 Microbiology

Overview

Objectives/Goals My objective was to learn if natural antibiotics or pharmaceutical antibiotics are more effective on slowing bacteria growth. Methods/Materials I cultured bacteria from my mouth, then measured and compared the zones of inhibion of natural and pharmaceutical antibiotics. I used 5 different natural antibiotics: Usnea, garlic, onion, white sage, and osha. I used 5 different pharmaceutical antibiotics: Ampicillin, erythromyacin, neomycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and kanamycin. Results Pharmaceutical antibiotics worked more consistantly than natural antibiotics, however, garlic averaged the widest zones of inhibion. Although garlic averaged the widest zone of inhibion (1.58 cm.), ampicillin and tetracycline were very close (1.47 cm.) Conclusions/Discussion My conclusion is that pharmaceutical antibiotics are more reliable, therefor more useful.

Summary statement

I tested natural antibiotics against pharmaceutical antibiotics to find out which is more effective on reducing the growth of bacteria.

Help received

Father helped make incubator; father gave advice on graphs.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2002 Microbiology · Entry J1304

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google