Natural Antibiotics vs. Pharmaceutical Antibiotics
Overview
Objectives/Goals My objective was to learn if natural antibiotics or pharmaceutical antibiotics are more effective on slowing bacteria growth. Methods/Materials I cultured bacteria from my mouth, then measured and compared the zones of inhibion of natural and pharmaceutical antibiotics. I used 5 different natural antibiotics: Usnea, garlic, onion, white sage, and osha. I used 5 different pharmaceutical antibiotics: Ampicillin, erythromyacin, neomycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, and kanamycin. Results Pharmaceutical antibiotics worked more consistantly than natural antibiotics, however, garlic averaged the widest zones of inhibion. Although garlic averaged the widest zone of inhibion (1.58 cm.), ampicillin and tetracycline were very close (1.47 cm.) Conclusions/Discussion My conclusion is that pharmaceutical antibiotics are more reliable, therefor more useful.
Summary statement
I tested natural antibiotics against pharmaceutical antibiotics to find out which is more effective on reducing the growth of bacteria.
Help received
Father helped make incubator; father gave advice on graphs.
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2006
Natural or Pharmaceutical: Which Works Best?
CSEF · 2008
Antibiotics: Natural vs. Pharmaceutical
CSEF · 2008
Do Natural or Pharmaceutical Antibiotics Work Better at Preventing Antibiotic Resistance from Occurring within Bacteria?
CSEF · 2017
Antibiotic Resistance: Synthetic vs. Natural
CSEF · 2003
Comparing the Effectiveness of Natural and Pharmaceutical Antibiotics
CSEF · 2007
Natural vs. Pharmaceutical Antibiotics
CSEF · 2013
The Amazing Antibiotic Race
CSEF · 2002
Garlic and Bacterial Inhibition
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects