Moral Judgment and the Principle of Double Effect
CSEF · 2015 Behavioral & Social Sciences
Overview
Objectives/Goals An online survey was conducted to assess people's moral judgments using the classic trolley problems. I ask: To what extent do demographic characteristics like gender and age influence the consistency of moral judgments? My hypotheses: People will contrast their answers to scenarios because of the principle of double effect, which states that people's moral judgments are often inconsistent when presented with different scenarios that ultimately result in the same outcome. Furthermore, demographics such as age, gender, education, ethnicity, religion, and political affiliation will have little influence on people's judgments because, in part, evolution has created a common, unconscious #moral grammar." Therefore, if I analyze each demographic individually and compare the different groups, then there will be no statistical difference between the observed and expected values. Methods/Materials Procedures: Create and send out and online survey. Collect and analyze data. Use Chi-Square analysis with 95% confidence level, where a p value less than or equal to .05 is significant, via SPSS to determine what, if any, demographic groups are significantly different from each other. Results The total percent of those who did demonstrate the principle of double effect is 68.6%. The significant statistical differences within demographics, calculated with Chi-Square test, showed that certain characteristics mattered in the consistency of moral judgment, as expressed in the principle of double effect. These characteristics included gender, age, education, and religion. Conclusions/Discussion One hypothesis was accepted because the majority of respondents did, in fact, demonstrate the principle of double effect, contradicting their moral judgment by answering "Yes" to Scenario 1 and "No" to Scenario 2 when in both cases the ratio of human life is 5:1 in regards to the greater good. However, the other theory was not accepted because, according to the data gathered, certain demographic characteristics do influence the consistency of moral reasoning. These groups included gender, age, education, and religion. Because of these results, one may question the validity of past studies regarding the idea that a "moral grammar" is hardwired into human brains. My study suggests that there may be a role for learning and an effect of environmental factors, such as society, on moral judgments.
Summary statement
To what extent do demographic characteristics - like gender and age - influence the consistency of moral judgments?
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2017
The Morality of Middle Schoolers
CSEF · 2015
Money and the Mind: How Does Someone's Economic Situation Affect Their Moral Decision Making?
CSEF · 2004
Tendencies of the Human Mind: The Human Psyche
CSEF · 2009
Decision Making in the Face of Risk
CSEF · 2014
Are You Mental or Moral? The Effect of Data on the Connection between Moral and Mental Stages from Piaget and Kohlberg
CSEF · 2017
Analyzing Human Perspective across Age Groups through Cognitive Psychology
CSEF · 2019
The Effects of Demand Characteristics on a Survey
CSEF · 2011
Reactions Based on Robert Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects