Investigation of the Impact of Common Toxicants on Survival Rates of Daphnia magna after Exposure to LC50 Levels
CSEF · 2017 Toxicology Second Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals The main objective is to determine if Daphnia magna are exposed to LC50 levels of common toxicants found in our waterways, then are removed from those conditions, will they have the same long term survival rate as the Control. The secondary objectives are 1) to determine if there is a correlation that the more harmful the toxicant, the shorter the life span once exposed then removed; 2) if exposure to two toxicants has a statistically significant more lethal impact than exposure to one toxicant. Methods/Materials Phase 1-Scouting - determine concentrations needed for acute reaction. Phase 2-Perform 3 trials of 10 Daphnia magna in 10 toxicant solutions [0%, .2%, .5%. 1%, 1.5%] to determine the LC50 [Lethal Concentration when 50% of population dies]. Solutions: oxybenzone sunscreen, zinc oxide sunscreen, imidacloprid pesticide, nitrogen fertilizer, Oxy & Zinc, Oxy & Pest, Oxy & Fert, Zinc & Pest, Zinc & Fert, Pest & Fert. Phase 3-Use LC50 value from Phase 2. Run 3 trials of ea. solution at 1%. Expose Daphnia to time needed to reach the LC50. Remove survivors & place in spring water. Record death rate. Results 1. In all trials except for one, exposure to 1% solutions prohibited the Daphnia from living out a natural lifespan once placed in spring water. Within 24 hours, 100% of the Daphnia were dead in 7 of the 10 solutions. Only exposure to 1% nitrogen resulted in Daphnia having the same survival rate as the Control. Solutions with nit. & oxy. and nit. & zinc survived 72 hrs & 144 hrs respectively. 2. There is NO consistent correlation between time to reach LC50 and long term survival of Daphnia. 3. If the 2 toxicant solution had either imid. or oxy., the difference in the lethal impact to the Daphnia compared to exposure to the toxicant individually was NOT statistically significant. If the 2 toxicant solution contained zinc. or nit., in all cases except for one, the difference in the lethal impact to the Daphnia compared to exposure to the toxicant individually WAS statistically significant. Conclusions/Discussion My hypothesis is mostly correct. All Daphnia exposed to 1 or 2 toxicants were not able to recover to live out a normal life span compared to the Control, with the exception of nitrogen. This shows that not all toxicants will result in certain death after exposure, once removed from the toxic environment. It also shows the importance of reducing the amount of toxicants that enter our waterways.
Summary statement
This experiment tests how exposure to LC50 levels of common toxicants in our marine waterways impacts the long term survival of Daphnia magna once they are removed from the toxic environment and placed in a clean environment.
Help received
I designed and performed the experiment on my own. My mom ordered the materials and provided lab assistance under my direction when needed.
Awards (1)
Competition history
- CSEF 2017
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2008
The Daphnia Dilemma
CSEF · 2018
How Byproducts Produced by Removal of Oxybenzone by Phytoremediation & Laccase/ABTS Beads Affect Morality of D. magna
CSEF · 2019
Daphnia Heart Rate: How Do the Central Valley's Most Common Water Pollutants Affect the Heart Rate of Daphnia magna?
CSEF · 2002
The Effect of Pollutants on the Reproductive Cycles of Daphniidae magna
CSEF · 2018
Analysis of Chronic Toxicity of Glyphosate on Fecundity and Mortality of Daphnia magna
CSEF · 2007
Death by Toxicity
CSEF · 2018
Effects of Parking Lot Run-off on Mortality Rates of Freshwater Daphnia and Cyclops
CSEF · 2013
The Effect of Agricultural Chemicals on Daphnia magna
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects