How Do Probiotics and Housing Affect Growth Rates in Dairy Calves?
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective was to determine how a new probiotic calf powder and plastic polymer hutches affect the growth rates in newborn calves. My hypotheses stated that if newborn calves are fed the probiotic calf powder then they will grow faster than those not fed the probiotic calf powder, and if newborn calves are housed in plastic polymer hutches their growth rate will be better than those housed in wooden hutches. Methods/Materials Twenty calves were tested. Five were given 1 gram probiotics per day and raised in plastic polymer hutches, and five were given 1 gram probiotics per day and raised in wooden hutches. Five were not given probiotics and were raised in plastic polymer hutches, and five were not given the probiotics and raised in wooden hutches. I tested on a weekly basis for 8 weeks. Each week all calves were measured for height, weight, and girth. They were also assessed for health using a rubric. Results Calves fed the new probiotic and housed in plastic polymer hutches had higher growth rates and were healthier than the calves not fed the new probiotics and raised in wooden hutches. The four groups ranked as follows: 1. Probiotics and Plastic Polymer Hutches 2. Probiotics and Wooden Hutches 3. No Probiotics and Plastic Polymer Hutches 4. No Probiotics and Wooden Hutches Conclusions/Discussion Dairy producers are looking for preventative health products. They are very aware of the public#s perception of using antibiotics to treat sick calves, and treating the calves adds to expenses in medicine and labor. It is important to keep dairy calves healthy in their early stages. Ten percent of calves die before they reach maturity, due to poor management, poor housing, or bad nutrition. With good management, the death loss may be lowered to only three to five percent. Calves also cost a lot of money. Newborns can cost up to $400.00. By the time a heifer is ready to calve, she is worth $1,800 to $2,500. For every calf that dies, the producer loses not only that asset, but also potential income. I found my hypothesis to be correct. The new probiotic proved to be a very worthwhile product as did the plastic polymer calf hutches. My project studied two variables, because I was comparing a new protocol (plastic polymer hutches and probiotic calf powder) for raising calves versus the traditional protocol (wooden hutches and no additives).
Summary statement
My project is about helping dairy producers in raising healthy, strong calves through probiotics and housing.
Help received
Mr. John Zmich, Dr. Bob Charley, and Mr. Roland Pourier explained how the probiotics work, used calves from Mr. Jim Wilson's herd, Dr. Claude J. Phene, Ph.D., explained statistical analysis to me, Dr. Jacqueline A. Reese, DVM, provided research information, Dad helped me find research information and
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
ISEF · 2023
Got Milk? Comparing the Acid Production of Bifidobacterium infantis When Grown in Different Milks
ISEF · 2021
The Effect of Different Protein Supplements on the Growth of Goat Kids
CSEF · 2018
Human Health: Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Lactobacillus Colony Forming Units in Probiotic Supplements
CSEF · 2016
Gut Wars: The Probiotic Force Awakens
ISEF · 2019
Year Two: Understanding the Effects of Bifidobacterium infantis on Honeybee Gut Parasite Nosema ceranae
CSEF · 2019
Formula Milk vs. Mother's Milk
CSEF · 2005
Does Varying Feed Affect the Milk of Lactating Caprines?
ISEF · 2021
Year 4: Developing a Multiple Linear Regression Model to Predict the Specific Effects of Various Lactic Acid Bacteria Dosages on the Overall Honey Bee Gut Microbiota and Nosema ceranae Reduction
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects