Gut Wars: The Probiotic Force Awakens
CSEF · 2016 Microbiology (General)
Overview
Objectives/Goals To determine whether the source of probiotic bacteria (live culture or commercial freeze dried capsules) differ in their ability to survive the stomach after ingestion. The primary hypothesis was that source did not matter. Goal 1- Establish a model of human stomach conditions. Goal 2- Compare numbers and growth rate of bacterial sources. Goal 3- Determine the effect of common breakfast foods on the bacterial growth. Methods/Materials Live Kefir culture, probiotic capsules, simulated gastric fluid (SGF), Pepsin, Sodium Taurocholate, Lecithin, MRS agar plates, test foods: (milk & sugar, egg, grapefruit, coffee, diet coke). 1.Establish amount of bacteria in live culture by serial diluting the culture in PBS Buffer and then plating the dilutions on MRS agar plates. Prepare an equivalent amount of freeze dried bacteria. 2.Artificial Stomach incubations consisted of 100 ml SFG, 100 ml of bacterial culture (1 or 10 billion cells) and 100 ml of water or test food solution. Results In the initial experiment, the number of bacteria in the kefir culture was determined to be approximately 1 Billion bacteria in 100 ml of culture. It was also observed that Kefir growth rate was 3-4 times faster than freeze dried bacteria (24 h vs. 72 h). It was then decided to test 1 billion bacteria (culture or freeze dried) in artificial stomach conditions. It was determined that 1 billion freeze dried bacteria had insufficient growth as only the PBS control grew colonies. In the next expt, 10 billion freeze dried bacteria were tested. Kefir bacteria survived in nearly all food conditions except for coffee which had a mild effect. In comparison, the 10 billion freeze-dried bacteria were highly affected by SGF alone, with about 50% of the loss bacterial numbers. Diet coke was found to decrease by 30%. Conclusions/Discussion The primary hypothesis was disproven. Kefir probiotic bacteria were shown to be more robust and faster growing than freeze dried bacteria. This is important as most people have a regular 24 hr. gut cycle and probiotic bacteria will be ineffective if they do not grow in this timeframe. The secondary hypothesis is that breakfast foods do not affect the ability of probiotics to survive the stomach and reach the colon has also been disproven. Coffee and diet coke have a negative effect on the growth of culture or freeze-dried bacteria.
Summary statement
My Project compares the ability of the two most common sources of Probiotic Bacteria to survive artificial stomach conditions and deliver beneficial bacteria to the colon.
Help received
Dr. Patrick Brassil at Theravance BioPharma provided assistance/guidance and access to lab equipment. Mrs. Nicole Shimshock my Science teacher provided additional guidance and suggestions.
Competition history
- CSEF 2016
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2015
The Survival of the Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus in a Model Stomach System
CSEF · 2017
Competitive Exclusion between Isolated Probiotics and Pathogen-Behaving Strains
CSEF · 2018
Human Health: Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Lactobacillus Colony Forming Units in Probiotic Supplements
ISEF · 2023
Got Milk? Comparing the Acid Production of Bifidobacterium infantis When Grown in Different Milks
CSEF · 2014
The Impact of Simulated Stomach Acid on Microorganism Growth in Organic and GMO Soybean/Yogurt Cultures
ISEF · 2020
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Antimicrobial Capabilities Against Bacterial Pathogens of Lactobacillus sp. and Other Strains Found in Probiotics
CSEF · 2005
The Mystery of Stubborn Milk: What Factors Can Inhibit the Fermentation of Milk?
CSEF · 2015
Does Gluten Affect the Growth of Probiotic Bacteria?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects