H(2)O: Making Every Drop Count

CSEF · 2012 Environmental Engineering (Junior Division Only) Honorable_mention Award

Overview

Objectives/Goals The objective of this experiment was to find an effective covering method that would significantly reduce water evaporation in aqueducts. It was hoped by the experimenter, that the data could be used to help decrease water loss in aqueducts that are used commercially. Methods/Materials Three different types of aqueducts were built as one meter long, concrete models and then put into testing. the three aqueduct designs used in this experiment were the semicircular, narrow and deep trapezoidal, and wide and shallow trapezoidal aqueducts. The models were built to have different capacities of 6,12.5,and 20 liters each. Three different covering methods were then tested on the aqueducts. The covers tested were a plastic sheet, plastic balls, and a Canadian powder known as Water Savr. A control group (aqueducts without covers) was also used to help compare the water loss of the three covers. Each cover underwent a series of 24 hour trials. The starting and ending water amounts were recorded along with the temperature and then used to generate evaporation rates. Results It was discovered that the plastic balls conserved the most amount of water. The plastic balls lost 5.00%-14.50% of the water but saved at least 85% of it. The powder Water Savr saved more than 75% water, but had an 24 hour evaporation rate of 9.00%-25.00%. 8.25%-20.00% of the water was evaporated everyday with the plastic sheet, but more than 80% of the water was saved. The control group had the highest amount of water loss losing 23.33%-51.50% of the water. The control group had an average water loss rate of over 30% in all the aqueducts. Conclusions/Discussion Overall, the plastic balls turned out to be the most effective cover to use on aqueducts. The plastic balls helped save over 85% of of the water and loss less than 15%. Water Savr ended up being the least effective cover loosing 38% more water than the plastic balls. The plastic sheet helped save over 80% of the water, but wasn't as effective as the plastic balls. The control trials proved that a significant amount of evaporation does occur and that more than 1/2 or 50% of the water can evaporate at one time.

Summary statement

This experiment was trying to find a more effective way to reduce water evaporation in aqueducts.

Help received

Dad helped buy the supplies, edit my writing, and build the aqueduct models; Mom helped edit and plan out my experimentation; my teachers, Mrs. Schumacher and Mrs Gillum guided me and gave me advice; officials from the Bureau of Reclamation and the San Diego Water Authority also advised me

Awards (1)

  • Honorable Mention

Competition history

  • CSEF 2012 Environmental Engineering (Junior Division Only) · Entry J1017

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google