Feel the Burn: Energy Content in Food
Overview
Objectives/Goals The original hypothesis had stated that 5% more fat would lead to a higher caloric content. The researcher had hoped to prove this through experimentation. Methods/Materials The method that had been used to receive results had been, and is commonly known as, the bomb calorimeter method. This is where food is completely oxidized to receive a reading. The calorimeter has been constructed using materials at hand; this is also true for the balance that was made. These include k#nex, wood, beakers, small heat resistant bowls, wire, and a nail to hold the food sample while it was being burned. Results When experimenting, the water that would give the results had an average rise in water temperature of 9.46 degrees Celsius. This was the average of all the foods that had been tested. All of the cereals had been tested the same way. Conclusions/Discussion After experimentation was complete, all of the results pointed to the statement that fat has a major impact on the amount of calories that are within a food.
Summary statement
Through many trials in the area of energy content in foods, it has become apparent that fat does cause food to have more calories per gram or per serving than non fat food.
Help received
Help Received by my Dad, Buddy Iannone Supervised use of open flame.
Competition history
- CSEF 2009
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2006
Food on Fire: Does Fat Content Affect Calorie Levels in Food?
CSEF · 2003
Need Energy? Got Calories?
ISEF · 2014
Burning Calories
CSEF · 2006
Crazy Calorimetry, Calories Consumed by You
CSEF · 2007
Are You Getting the Energy You Need?
CSEF · 2012
Burning Calories: How Much Energy Is Stored in Different Types of Food?
CSEF · 2014
Burning Calories
CSEF · 2014
Wanna Burn Some Calories?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects