Efficacy of Seismic Retrofits in Diminishing Surface Wave Induced Swaying
CSEF · 2011 Applied Mechanics & Structures
Overview
Objectives/Goals My experiment investigated the effectiveness of the most commonly applied modifications to structures to reduce shaking, provoked by the compressing and expanding motion of P-waves, sustained during seismic activity. Base isolation, shear walls, and reinforced wall bursts were the models of retrofit I tested. Methods/Materials I constructed four rudimentary two-story buildings using fiberboard and wooden dowels. To one I attached base isolating feet composed of fiberboard and cotton balls, to the second shear walls of fiberboard slats, and to the third building I affixed supplementary dowels acting as reinforced wall bursts. I built an electric shake table from a box within a larger box allowed to roll freely on styrofoam balls. A wire ran from the interior box to a multi-speed kitchen Stand mixer which acted as the motor, jerking it to and fro. With velcro, the structures were fixed to the shake table and a tank of colored water lined with white paper was fastened to their tops. As the buildings were subjected to three trials with foreshocks, a mainshock, and aftershocks, waves in the tank splashed, staining the paper. The heights of the tallest stains were measured, averaged, and compared to that of the control. Results Compared to the control whose wave height exceeded 70mm, the base isolated structure decreased shaking by 38% with an average tallest wave height of 43 2/3mm, the reinforced wall burst decreased shaking by 53% its average tallest wave height being 33mm, and the shear wall structure reduced shaking by 56% with an average peak wave height of 33 1/3mm. Conclusions/Discussion Shear walls proved most effective in reducing building sway, reinforced wall bursts following narrowly behind, while base isolators were least effective. However, when subjected to the more violent shaking of the simulated mainshock, base isolators visibly buffered more of the motion than the other retrofits.
Summary statement
Compare the effectiveness of seismic retrofits in reducing earthquake induced P-wave generated swaying.
Help received
My father accompanied me to various stores for supplies, aided in cutting dowels, supervised trials, and provided encouragement.
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2011
What's Shakin'? A Study on Finding the Most Earthquake-Resistant Design of Base Isolation During Seismic Activity
CSEF · 2013
Seismic Vibration Control: Finding the Best Strategy for Minimizing Damage to a Structure During an Earthquake
CSEF · 2006
Don't Be Swayed: A Study of the Dampening Abilities of Viscous Dampers in Buildings
CSEF · 2012
A Study of the Relative Effectiveness of Two Building Foundation Isolation Techniques in Response to Equal Vibrations
CSEF · 2016
Building Better Earthquake Resistant Structures
CSEF · 2009
Building Buildings Better. Which Design Does Better in an Earthquake: Tuned Mass Damper or Base Isolator?
CSEF · 2013
Building Stability during Earthquakes
CSEF · 2002
Determing the Most Optimal Structure to Resist Specific Seismic Waves
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects