E-World versus Real World, Reading Comprehension
CSEF · 2002 Behavioral Sciences
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective of this project was to determine if a person's reading comprehension is greater when reading written material on paper or from a computer screen. I believe that the majority of people tested will have better comprehension when reading from paper than a computer screen. Methods/Materials Twenty people were given ninety seconds to read a short paragraph printed on a piece of paper. They were then given sixty second to take a test written on paper to measure their comprehension of what they read. The same twenty people were given ninety seconds to read a different short paragraph from a laptop computer screen. They were then given sixty seconds to take a test written on paper to measure their comprehension of what they read on the computer screen. Half of the test group read test "One" from the paper and test "Two" from the computer. The other half of the test group read test "Two" from the paper and test "One" from the computer screen. The tests were graded to determine the number of correct answers. Results The data obtained supported my hypothesis that the majority of people tested have better comprehension when reading from paper than a computer screen. The average number of correct answers of the test of comprehension when reading from the computer screen was 6.5. The average number of correct answers of the test of comprehension when reading from the paper was 8.0. The majority of people tested had better comprehension when reading from paper than a computer screen. Eighty percent of the subjects tested, scored higher on the test related to the passage printed on paper than the passage read from the computer screen. Conclusions/Discussion As technology continues to develop, more of our daily tasks are completed using the computer and it appears from this experiment that reading comprehension is negatively affected by reading from a computer screen. Therefore, it is important for people designing things, such as, software or web sites to incorporate techniques to assist in communicating with their audience. This may include things like proper font style and color selection, as well as, size. This experiment also demonstrated that if a thorough understanding of a piece of written material is of great importance, that paper is a better medium for presenting the information than the computer screen.
Summary statement
This experiment was done to determine if people have find it more difficult to comprehend material read from the computer than from paper.
Help received
Father assisted with proofreading of my material and reviewed the assembly of my board.
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2011
Read All About It: Does Reading from a Printed Page vs. a Digital Screen Affect Reading Comprehension?
CSEF · 2016
Electronic Media vs. Paper: Effect on Teenagers' Reading Comprehension
CSEF · 2018
Is Technology Good for Us After All?
CSEF · 2016
Effects of Online vs. Printed Textbooks
ISEF · 2015
Paper Texts versus Electronic Texts in Terms of Reading
CSEF · 2014
The Great Reading Mystery: Was It the Book or Was It the Tablet?
ISEF · 2024
Comparison of Brain Waves, Blinking, and Reading Comprehension When Reading on an Electronic Device and a Printed Text
CSEF · 2013
The Effects of Traditional Printers Black Ink and Electronic Ink as Used on a Kindle on Reading Comprehension
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects