Do You See What I See?

CSEF · 2010 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only) Honorable_mention Award

Overview

Objectives/Goals My objective was to determine whether changing the symbols used on an eye chart would affect the vision testing results. Methods/Materials I used 4 different Snellen Eye charts and tested the vision of 80+ participants in different age groups. My tests compared the vision acuity across two different eye charts in three cycles. I carried out the tests using 3 controls keeping the lighting, testing distance and chart height constant within each cycle. I recorded visual acuity and age. Results In cycle 1, most participants had higher visual acuity with the Tumbling-E chart as compared to a language chart (English or Hebrew). In Cycle 2, participants, occasionally, had a higher visual acuity with the Symbol chart, but on average the results for both charts were the same. In Cycle 3, pre-school kids ages 4 and 5 were tested on the Symbol chart and the English chart. Most pre-schoolers had the same visual acuity on both the charts, the difference being that the English chart was easier to read than the Symbol chart. Conclusions/Discussion After analysis of Cycle 1 results, I realized that there was an additional variable, namely, the different number of unique letters/symbols on each chart. The English/ Hebrew charts have 9 letters, but the Tumbling E chart has 4 symbols. Comparison of the results from Cycle 1 with Cycle 2 showed that as the number of symbols on the Symbol chart (12), came closer to the number of letters on the language charts (9), the difference in visual acuity reduced. Based on this, my conclusion was that changing the symbols used on an eye chart would not affect the vision testing results. Next, in Cycle 3, I tried to determine whether #Familiarity# with symbols is another variable by testing pre-schoolers, who I considered less accomplished readers. I observed that they were often unable to explain what they saw on the Symbols chart, but were familiar with the English alphabet. I would like to do further work to devise a method to test 'Familiarity'. This experiment confirmed that the DMV can use a symbols-based eye-chart for vision testing without any significant difference in results, instead of the current language chart. This would help to overcome the limitations associated with the ability to read any particular language.

Summary statement

My project confirms that changing the symbols used on an eye chart will not affect the vision testing results, thereby assisting the DMV in replacing their current language eye-charts with symbol charts for eye-testing.

Help received

My teacher Ms. Ligeti guided and encouraged me throughout my project. My Dad helped with creating the graphs. My Mom and my little brother for always being there for me.

Awards (1)

  • Honorable Mention

Competition history

  • CSEF 2010 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only) · Entry J0601

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google