Common Crash Cushions
CSEF · 2010 Applied Mechanics & Structures
Overview
Objectives/Goals To build and test different crash barriers that effectively reduce the impact force on the vehicle colliding with them. Methods/Materials Construct a very durable "vehicle." Construct a track that the vehicle may travel down. Construct a simple machine that will convert the force 40 lbs falling, to pulling the vehicle down the track. The vehicle is accelerated down the track using this machine until the vehicle impacts a solid wall, the deceleration is then measured using an accelerometer. The accelerometer is also used to determine the speed of the vehicle at the time of impact. A baseline deceleration at the time of impact is established. More tests are conducted with different barriers. One barrier is two 3/4 inch PVC pipes that are 3 feet long and can flex when impacted. Another barrier is two shock absorbers from the suspension of a car. And the third is a one gallon jug filled with water and sealed. The deceleration on impact of the different barriers is then compared to the baseline to determine the barrier's effectiveness at removing energy from the vehicle during impact. Results Because the accelerometer could not react fast enough only the time data is useful during impact so the deceleration had to be calculated mathematically using the available data. In all tests the vehicle is traveling approximately 8.8 m/s at the time of impact. The solid wall brought the vehicle to a stop in 0.04 seconds, indicating a maximum deceleration of 222.8 m/s2. The deceleration with the PVC pipe barrier is 162.75 m/s2, the deceleration with gallon jugs was 194.5 m/s2, and the deceleration with the shock absorbers was 170 m/s2. Conclusions/Discussion The PVC pipe had the lowest deceleration, however, due to the elastic properties if PVC it was the least effective barrier. After the vehicle impacts and comes to a complete stop, the PVC rebounds and accelerates the vehicle in the opposite direction of impact increasing the total acceleration. The shock absorbers are the most effective barrier. The gallon jugs were the next most effective, then the solid wall, then the PVC pipes. An impact acceleration the same as what was recorded for the baseline tests, 222.8 m/s2, could cause serious injury to a person, thus the importance of developing crash barrier technology. The results of the experiments conducted suggest that using shock absorbers is the best way to reduce the force a person might experience in an accident.
Summary statement
To design and test different crash barriers to determine which is the most effective at removing energy from a vehicle during a collision.
Help received
Physics teacher Mr. Mark Grubb supplied the accelerometer and answered occasional questions.
Competition history
- CSEF 2010
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
Will Crash Barrels Decrease the Stopping Force When a Car Impacts?
CSEF · 2008
Barrier Beat Down: A Study of the Efficiency of Six Barrier Configurations
ISEF · 2020
Engineering a Superior Bumper Reinforcement System with a Piezoelectric Force Sensor in High Energy Collisions
CSEF · 2011
Shock Absorbers: Counteracting Physics and Force
CSEF · 2005
The Effect of Suspensions on a Car's Vertical Acceleration
CSEF · 2013
Tsunami: Reducing the Impact
CSEF · 2013
Concussion Cushion
CSEF · 2015
A Novel Design and Evaluation of an Air Cushioning Mechanism for Helmets to Reduce Impact Acceleration on the Head
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects