Tsunami: Reducing the Impact

CSEF · 2013 Applied Mechanics & Structures

Overview

Objectives/Goals The objective was to find out which of four barrier designs would be most effective in reducing the impact of a tsunami wave on land. Methods/Materials Testing was done by constructing a wave tank and placing the different barriers into the tank. To keep them from floating away, they were screwed into the tank. A tsunami was then created by dumping a 5 gallon bucket of water from the opposite shore and measuring the distance the wave traveled inland. I also tested the distance the wave traveled without a barrier. Each barrier was tested two ways: underwater and at sealevel. Each barrier was tested three times each, except Barrier #4 broke beyond repair after the first test. After each tsunami wave, the distance was recorded in inches with a ruler that was taped to the base of the waterline, measuring upshore. Results The results showed that Barrier #2 was the best for both the sea level and underwater tests. Barrier #4 was the worst, having broken during the first test. Conclusions/Discussion My hypothesis was incorrect. I thought that Barrier #3 would be the best for reducing the impact of the tsunami. Barrier #2 was the best. Although Barrier #2 was the best in reduing the impact of the tsunami on the land, I would like to see Barrier #1 used in the real world because it would allow sea life to return to the sea as well as diminishing the impact on the shoreline.

Summary statement

Reducing the impact of tsunamis on land through the use of sea level and underwater barriers.

Help received

My dad helped me construct my wave tank. My mom took photos and helped me with the project board.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2013 Applied Mechanics & Structures · Entry J0313

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google