Cereal Critters: A Study of Contaminants in Mass-Marketed and Organic Breakfast Cereals
CSEF · 2007 Product Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals I hypothesize that mass-marketed cereals contain fewer contaminants and microorganisms than organic cereals because pesticides are used in the growth of their key ingredients and chemical preservatives are used in their processing. Methods/Materials I purchased 10 mass-marketed and 10 organic cereals, noting preservatives, country of origin and packaging materials for each. I then measured ½ ounce of each sample and conducted a visual contaminant study vs. a pre-determined rating scale. I crushed the sample with a pestle, made a slide, and observed it under a microscope at a 4x magnification level, charting any observations. I added water to the specimen slide and observed it at a 40x magnification level, again noting any activity/findings. I repeated the process for each sample, comparing and drawing conclusions from my findings. Results There was no difference in the amount of visible contaminants and debris between the mass-marketed and organic cereal samples in a visual inspection. Contaminant levels observed at the 4x magnification level were also similar, with all debris in the minimal range. Organic cereals yielded contaminants in a greater magnitude and severity than did mass-marketed cereal at the 40x magnification level, 70% vs. 20% of samples. Most mass-marketed cereals studied used the chemical BHT as a preservative, while all organic cereals sampled used a natural preservative. Cereals containing fruit and those manufactured outside of the U.S. correlated to a higher level of contamination. Conclusions/Discussion Mass-marketed cereals contain fewer contaminants than organic cereals. While neither showed easily-visible debris, organic cereals showed markedly heavier and more contamination under microscopic magnification, a 50 percentage point difference. The use of pesticides and chemical preservatives in mass-marketed cereals appear to be effective in limiting contamination. Cereals containing fruit and those manufactured outside the U.S. have a greater likelihood of containing unwanted matter.
Summary statement
My project compared various mass-marketed and organic cereals under different levels of magnification in order to determine if one type had a greater presence of contaminants and microorganisms than the other.
Help received
Mother drove me to the grocery stores & Father oversaw microscope viewing.
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2005
The Crunch Munchers vs. The Mush Mashers
CSEF · 2009
Effects of Fruit Pesticide Residues on Brine Shrimp Mortality
CSEF · 2012
Milk Matters! Organic vs. Conventional Milk: Comparison of Milk Spoilage (pH) and Bacterial Growth
CSEF · 2015
Effects of Produce Washes on Pesticide Residue and Brine Shrimp Mortality
CSEF · 2013
The Effects of Pesticide Residues on Brine Shrimp Mortality
CSEF · 2012
Are Parents Poisoning Children with Baby Food? Investigation of Arsenic Concentrations in Store Bought Apple Sauce
CSEF · 2008
Energy to Burn! Sugary vs. Healthy: Which Type of Cereal Oxidizes the Highest Amount of Caloric Chemical Energy?
CSEF · 2006
Determining the Crunchability, Floatability, and Stability of Breakfast Cereals
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects