Bee-yond the Label: Chemical Fingerprinting of Honey from Diverse Origins
CSEF · 2026 Chemistry (Senior Division)
Overview
Honeybees face increasing stress from pesticide exposure, parasites, and poor nutrition, while honey is among the most frequently adulterated foods worldwide. This project investigates how pesticide residue profiles differ among honey samples from diverse geographic origins and whether chemical fingerprinting can reveal adulteration and potential risks to bee health. I hypothesized that small-scale local honeys would exhibit lower pesticide burdens, and fewer signs of adulteration than commercial blended honeys, due to reduced economic pressure for fraud and lower exposure risk from agricultural pesticide use. To test this, I analyzed 8 honey samples from local beekeepers in Orange County, California, and 13 commercial and international honeys. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to identify unique floral chemical components and detect adulteration markers, including high-heat sugar degradation products such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was employed to screen for 250 common pesticides and quantify detected residues. Samples were compared for individual pesticide exposures and overall trends. Local honeys contained a similar number of unique pesticide detections compared to commercial honeys; however, cumulative pesticide loads trended lower in local samples, though not reaching statistical significance (77 ± 23 ng/mL, n = 8 vs. 196 ± 77 ng/mL, n = 13; p = 0.133). At least two pesticides, methamidophos and oxamyl, exceeded regulatory limits in some samples. Most honeys displayed distinct floral markers, supporting geographic verification, e.g manuka from New Zealand, except for highly processed blends. Overall, chemical fingerprinting effectively identified pesticide exposure patterns, floral origin, and adulteration signatures.
Competition history
- CSEF 2026
Related projects
ISEF · 2017
Pollen Count and Analysis of Store Honey and NC Honey Samples for Content and Purity
ISEF · 2023
Do Bees Vector Pollutants in the Honey They Make?: Phase II
ISEF · 2019
What Is Honey? A Comparison of Honey from Iowa Beekeepers vs. National Store Brand Honey Using Pollen and Chemical Analyses
ISEF · 2016
The Bee's Knees: The Effect of Secondary Metabolites in Place of Neonicotinoid Pesticides on Apis mellifera and Drosophila melanogaster
CSEF · 2017
Don't Mess with my Bee's Nervous System! Investigating the Effects of Neonicotinoids on Bee Colonies
CSEF · 2018
Pollination! Its What's for Dinner! Investigating the Effects of Neonicotinoids on Bee Pollinators
CSEF · 2015
Honey! Where Is All the Honey? The Effect of Stored Pollen Supplies on Honey Production
CSEF · 2011
Leave Me the Birds and the Bees Please!
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects