Active Noise Control: Searching for the Sound of Silence
CSEF · 2008 Physics & Astronomy Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective is to demonstrate the active noise control technique and to measure the effects of noise type, noise frequency, and the separation distance between the noise and the antinoise speakers on the effectiveness of active noise control. The goal is to understand the fundamentals of active noise control to design more effective and affordable active noise cancellation applications. Methods/Materials Materials used include a computer to synthesize the noise and antinoise signals, two speakers, and a noise meter. The test apparatus was built of plywood and the walls are lined with acoustic absorbing foam. Tests were conducted using different types of noise (sine, sawtooth, and square wave) at different frequencies (250 Hz to 2000 Hz). The distance between the speakers was varied between 2 cm and 10 cm. to simulate the effect of separation distance on Active Noise Control. The decibel level with and without active noise control was recorded as a function of the noise type, the distance in between the speakers, and the frequency of the noise Results At fixed distances between the speakers, the percent reduction in the noise intensity decreases as the frequency increases from 250Hz to 2000Hz. Active noise cancellation is very effective at a small distance between the speakers (25% reduction at 2cm), but not at longer distances (5% reduction at 10cm). Sawtooth functions have the highest reduction rate in noise level (30% reduction), while the square wave function is least effective (20% reduction). 72% of those surveyed are aware of noise pollution, but only 41% understand that active noise control works best at low frequencies. Conclusions/Discussion Active Noise Control performs best when noises at low frequency are used in the tests. Active Noise Control is more effective at short distances between the speakers because the noise and the antinoise signals interact with each other without interference from the surrounding. The everyday, broadband noises are not strongly canceled by Active Noise Control. The shape of the narrowband noise does not make a significant difference in the results. In conclusion, the effectiveness active noise control depends on frequency, type of noise, and the distance between the noise and the antinoise.
Summary statement
Active noise control works best with noise functions at low frequencies and small distances between the noise and the antinoise; therefore it is an effective method to manage the noise pollution problems in an industrial environment.
Help received
My mother helped format my board. My father helped me construct my test apparatus and edit my report.
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2008
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2002
Active Noise Control: Reducing Noise by Adding Noise
CSEF · 2019
Soundwaves: Goodbye to Noise Pollution
CSEF · 2005
Designing Active Audio Noise Canceling Circuits
CSEF · 2010
Can You Turn Down the Noise?
CSEF · 2005
Sonic Collisions
CSEF · 2017
Formulating Novel Acoustic Designs for Varying Building Layouts to Absorb Excess Ambient Noise and Increase Productivity
CSEF · 2018
More Effective Hearing Protection
CSEF · 2005
Tired of Noise? Here's a Solution!
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects