Active Noise Control: Reducing Noise by Adding Noise
CSEF · 2002 Applied Mechanics/ Structures & Mechanisms/ Manufacturing
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective is to determine the effectiveness of active noise control as functions of noise frequency, noise type, and the distance between the noise and anti-noise sources. I also proved the principle of active noise control using an active noise control electric circuit board and headphones. My hypothesis is that active noise control is most effective with low frequency, and that the noise type and distance will not affect the performance of active noise control. Methods/Materials Materials used include a test chamber made of wood and acoustic foam, 2 speakers, a noise level meter, a sound synthesizer, and electronic components for my circuit board. Tests were conducted using noise and anti-noise sources of different frequencies (200 Hz to 1000 Hz) and different types (sine, sawtooth, squarewave, daily noises). To test the effect of distance, the speakers were separated from 2 inches to 8 inches. The sound level with and without active noise control is recorded as a function of frequency, noise source, and distance between the noise and anti-noise source. The electronic circuit board was tested with headphones to reduce background noises while listening to music. Results At two inches separation, the 200 Hz has an average of 30% reduction in noise intensity. Also, the sine and sawtooth function displayed similar patterns in cancellation. As the frequency increases, the percent of reduction decreases. At eight inches separation, the effect of frequency and wave shape is less significant and the average percentage of reduction is reduced as well. The test with the analog circuit shows about a 5-dB decrease in the background noise. 71% of those surveyed know about noise pollution. However, only 37% correctly answered how active noise control works. Conclusions/Discussion Active noise control is more effective with low frequency noises than high frequency noises. The shape of the noise source affects the results of active noise control. The sine and sawtooth function behaved similarly because of their similar shape. Also, active noise control performs better at shorter distances rather than father distances. Finally, people are aware of active noise control and noise pollution, but they are not aware about the details behind these topics. In conclusion, active noise control is affected by the frequency and shape of the noise and by the distance between the noise source and anti-noise source.
Summary statement
Active noise control works well with low frequency noises and small distances between the noise and anti-noise, therefore headphones are the best application of active noise control.
Help received
My mother helped format various materials. My father helped build apparatus and edit the report.
Awards (1)
- Category Award
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2008
Active Noise Control: Searching for the Sound of Silence
CSEF · 2019
Soundwaves: Goodbye to Noise Pollution
CSEF · 2005
Designing Active Audio Noise Canceling Circuits
CSEF · 2018
More Effective Hearing Protection
CSEF · 2017
Formulating Novel Acoustic Designs for Varying Building Layouts to Absorb Excess Ambient Noise and Increase Productivity
CSEF · 2010
Can You Turn Down the Noise?
ISEF · 2022
Active Noise Control in Ventilation Ducts Using the LMS Algorithm
CSEF · 2008
Can You Hear Me? A Comparative Study of Headphones/Earphones for MP3 Players
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects