Which Nose Cone Is the Best when Flown?
CSEF · 2019 Aerodynamics/ Hydrodynamics (Junior Division Only) Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate which nose cone design would be the most efficient for a slow moving projectile. I predict that the nose cone in an elliptical shape will be the most efficient for a slow moving rocket because it will allow fluids to flow around the body and used to their advantage rather than reflecting fluids which will consume a lot of energy. Methods Produced a waterproof ramp made of gutter splash guards and cardboard and a container with straws that would produce laminar flow. The fluid with reduced turbulence would come out of the container onto the ramp where it would come into contact with one of the eight foam nose cone designs and a rocket body. There, I could visualize how much fluid displacement was caused by the nosecone designs in centimeters. Also, get mass of the nose cones and the distance of its outer mold line. Results The predicted most efficient elliptical nose cone had an average fluid displacement of 1 centimeter on each side and weighed 1.5 grams. The nose cone design with the least mass was the spire cone weighing 0.5 grams but having an average fluid displacement of 1.25 centimeters on each side. The true most efficient nose cone design was the conical nose cone which has a mass of only 0.9 grams and an average fluid displacement of 1 centimeter on each side. Conclusions In conclusion, my hypothesis was incorrect, and the nose cone in a conical shape had the least average fluid displacement for the least mass which proved the conical design to be the most efficient for slow-moving projectiles. I discovered that for slow-moving projectiles, even though the nose cone may be able to use the moving fluids around to its advantage, the best nose cone is one that can separate the flow by being in a cone shape. This is important since it can expand a students knowledge in school activities like building the most aerodynamic bottle rockets.
Summary statement
I measured fluid displacement and mass of different nose cone designs to observe which nose cone design was the most efficient for slow-moving projectiles.
Help received
I designed a safer, more compact way to test and observe the properties of fluid dynamics when in contact with different objects in a two-dimensional form. I received verbal support from my parents throughout the journey of my project.
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2019
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2011
A Nose for Altitude
ISEF · 2025
Analyzing the Effectiveness of Various Rocket Nose Cone Shapes in Reducing the Effect of Aerodynamic Drag Experienced During Flight
CSEF · 2011
Turbulent Torpedoes
ISEF · 2025
The Effect of Nose Cone Geometry on Rocket Aerodynamics
CSEF · 2002
Rocket Science
CSEF · 2012
What Fin Shape Causes a Model Rocket to Reach the Highest Altitude?
CSEF · 2026
What Shape is Most Aerodynamic?
CSEF · 2016
The Effect of Textures on Rocket Shuttle Drag
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects