Which Angle of Attack Generates Maximum Lift for Cambered and Symmetrical Airfoils?
CSEF · 2002 Aerodynamics/ Hydrodynamics
Overview
Objectives/Goals The project's purposes were 1) to determine the geometric and effective angles of attack that would generate maximum lift for the airfoils I tested and 2) to determine how an airfoil's camber affects the angle at which it generates maximum lift. Most commercial aircraft (with moderately cambered wings) stall between 15 and 20 degrees, immediately after generating maximum lift. Therefore, I hypothesized that a moderately cambered airfoil would generate maximum lift at a geometric angle between 15 and 20 degrees. I also hypothesized that increasing camber would increase the angle that generated maximum lift. Methods/Materials Three airfoils were constructed: one moderately cambered (A), one symmetrical (B, the control), and one highly cambered (C). In a wind tunnel, each was tested for lift at fifteen effective angles of attack from -30 to 40 degrees (at 5-degree intervals). Lift was calculated by finding the difference in each airfoil's weight before and during each test and converting this weight (grams) to lift (newtons). The cambered airfoils' lift patterns were compared to the symmetrical airfoil's. All other variables of lift (airfoil planform area, air velocity, and air density) were controlled. Results Both the moderately cambered airfoil (A) and symmetrical airfoil (B) generated maximum lift at an effective angle of attack between 25 and 30 degrees (a geometric angle between 16 and 21 degrees). The highly cambered airfoil generated maximum lift at an effective angle of 40 degrees (a geometric angle of 28 degrees). Conclusions/Discussion My original hypothesis was correct; the moderately cambered airfoil (A) (modeled after a Boeing 747-400 wing cross-section) generated maximum lift in this range. As Airfoil C demonstrated, camber in an airfoil increases not only the angle of attack that generates maximum lift but also the rate at which lift increases. The symmetrical airfoil (B) likely exhibited patterns similar to A's because the scale's shape may have generated additional lift.
Summary statement
This project examines 1) the effective and geometric angles of attack that generate maximum lift for airfoils and 2) how camber affects these angles.
Help received
Father helped construct airfoils.
Awards (1)
- Category Award
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2005
At What Angle Is the Lift of a Wing Maximized?
CSEF · 2013
The Effect of Airfoil Design and Angle of Attack on Lift
CSEF · 2018
An Uplifting Discovery: What Is the Optimal Angle of Attack for Maximum Lift?
CSEF · 2006
How Does the Camber of an Airfoil Affect the Lift-to-Drag-Ratio?
CSEF · 2015
Investigating the Effects of Camber on Airfoil Lift
CSEF · 2009
How Wing Design Affects Lift across Different Angles of Attack
CSEF · 2004
Aerodynamic Lift: It's Not a Drag. Which Wing Design Will Create the Greatest Lift?
CSEF · 2009
Which Airfoil Design Generates the Most Lift?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects