What Is the Physical Proximity of Discomfort in Humans with a Non-Touch Approach?
CSEF · 2007 Behavioral & Social Sciences
Overview
Objectives/Goals My objective was to find the point of discomfort in human adolescents. Methods/Materials The materials I used were 50 human adolescents, one 150 centimeter measuring tape, and myself. I randomly tested 50 human adolescents for their proximity of discomfort. To do this, I asked them if they would participate in an experiment; if they agreed, I would begin by asking them their age, sex, ethnicity, relation to myself, and their feeling towards me and the mood towards the day. I would then proceed to laying out a 150 centimeter measuring tape between us. Then, I'd have them stand at the 150 centimeter mark, while I would stand at the 0 centimeter mark. After that, I'd ask them to tell me at which point they felt uncomfortable, or the need to step back. I'd then advance 10 centimeters until they told me they felt uncomfortable or the need to step back (or if they visibly stepped back), asking them each time after every advance. Results In my results, I found out that White people are most comfortable at a greater distance (24.5 cm.), while Chinese people are most comfortable in a closer distance (10 cm.); females were more comfortable at a closer distance (19.96 cm.) than males (20.96 cm.); good friends were most comfortable in a closer distance (11.5 cm.) than strangers (24.29 cm.) were; people who have a good mood /relationship were more comfortable in a closer distance (16.1 cm.) than those who had a bad relationship/mood (46.75 centimeters). Conclusions/Discussion My results supported my hypothesis and gave me a good idea of what distances human adolescents considered uncomfortable. Information in my projects expands what Edward T. Hall had originally uncovered on the topic called 'Proxemics.'
Summary statement
My project is about finding the proximity of discomfort in human adolescents with a non-touch approach.
Help received
Mother bought materials and helped punch the hole for the ribbon on my display board; Test subjects helped by participating,
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2005
Too Close For Comfort
CSEF · 2011
The Space between Two People When They Meet
CSEF · 2006
Too Close for Comfort? The Effects of Height and Gender on Personal Space Requirements in Preadolescent Students
CSEF · 2013
Social Pressures
CSEF · 2004
The Effects of Color on Human Depth Perception
CSEF · 2005
Screeech! What Makes Particular Sounds Irritating?
CSEF · 2008
Spaced Out: A Study of Perching Distances between Pigeons
CSEF · 2019
The Effect of Fear on Spatial Perception
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects