Weak vs. Strong

CSEF · 2009 Materials Science (Junior Division Only)

Overview

Objectives/Goals To test the strength of wood by using a battering ram. Methods/Materials Materials: Battering ram materials 1) wood 2)nails 3) saws 4)sheet metal 5)rope 6)drill 7) file for sanding Wood: 1) Douglas Fir 2) Redwood 3) White Oak Method: 1) Battering ram was designed and created using the above matierals. 2) Adult was used to operate the saw 3) All other tools were used by student. 4. The three types of wood were purchased and kept in a room for two weeks prior to the experiment to guarantee as much as possible that they contained the same amount of moisture. 5) The pieces of wood were put into the battering ram one at a time. 6) The same person pulled the battering ram back and forward in an attempt to make sure the same amount of force was being used when the wood was tested. 7)The experiement was video taped and photographed. 8) The wood was used to break cinder block 9) Observations were made by several people who were asked to rate the amount of damage done to each piece of wood 10) Experiment was done three times to verify results. Results Redwood was the strongest. White Oak was the weakest. The Douglas Fir was weaker than the Redwood but stronger than the White Oak. Conclusions/Discussion All woods do not have the same strength. Strength of wood should be a factor when building or using wood.

Summary statement

Our project is testing the strength of different woods

Help received

My dad used the electric saw. He taught me how to use the screwdrivers, drills and handsaw. My mom helped get the photographs developed and took us shopping for the supplies for the board.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2009 Materials Science (Junior Division Only) · Entry J1514

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google