We Love That Basketball
CSEF · 2014 Materials Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals My project was to determine which playing surface is best for dribbling a basketball. Methods/Materials Each surface area was prepared by taping a meter stick to a wall or pole and videotaping the basketball drop from a consistent height with one bounce measured. This was repeated ten times at each surface area. Data was collected and the height differences were calculated. Results The smallest difference in drop and bounce height was the tile floor, meaning that the ball rebounded higher on that surface. The asphalt absorbed the most energy and the ball did not bounce back as high. Conclusions/Discussion The tile floor absorbed less energy from the ball and allowed the ball to bounce higher. From my playing experience, the tile floor is a harder surface than the wood floor, but less hard than the asphalt. Maybe it is just the right amount of hardness but I like playing on the wood court better.
Summary statement
This project tested which surface a basketball bounces highest on and requires the least amount of energy dribbling.
Help received
Mother helped run statistical analysis in Excel.
Competition history
- CSEF 2014
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2009
Should Your Basketball Be Green?
CSEF · 2007
The NBA Takes a Bad Bounce: Evaluating Leather vs. Synthetic Basketballs
CSEF · 2015
Bounce!
CSEF · 2003
That's the Way the Ball Bounces
CSEF · 2013
The Temperature Effects on Various Balls
CSEF · 2017
Knee Kindness
CSEF · 2009
Tennis Ball Bounciness Experiment: Does the Brand of Tennis Ball Affect How Bouncy It Is?
CSEF · 2019
How Do Various Types of Table Tennis Balls Differ in Bounce Height?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects