Viability Variables
Overview
Objectives/Goals The purpose of my project is to find out exactly what it is that I shold refrain from when I Artificially Inseminate (AI) my dairy goats. There is a myriad of beliefs involving sperm and their sensitivity. It is my mission to enhance my kowledge of the potential for unviable sperm resulting from irresponsible handling. I am testing several beliefs and also usnig substances commonly used in the AI/semen handling process, therefore expanding my knowledge. Methods/Materials I tested several substances and environmental variables common to the AI/semen handling process. I exposed sperm to rubbing alcohol, sub-normal thawing temperatures, above-normal thawing temperatures, non-spermicidal lubricant, and florescent light. Results My results varied, and were quite surprising. As for the rubbing alcohol, the sperm that were exposed to the alcohol experienced necrozoospermia (a complete lack of living sperm). But that was the problem. Virtually none of the sperm were able to be exposed. I was using AI frozen semen, which is treated with several chemicals and antibiotics. These substances reacted violently with the alcohol, creating a barrier of sorts between the main of the semen sample and the alcohol. Therefore, only the sperm on the immediate outside of the sample were affected. The lubricant, on the other hand, had a crippling effect on the sperm. Because of it's consistancy, it would not allow the semen to move, consequently causing the sperm to be unviable. If the sperm cannot move, it cannot fertilize an egg. Both the above-normal and sub-normal thawing temperatures rendered the sperm unnviable. They were not "killed" per say, but the exposure severly limited locomotion: they were extremely lethargic. The florescent light had results identically matching the thawing temperatures. Conclusions/Discussion My conclusion are that most beliefs about sperm sensitivity are true. A sperm's viability is affected by any variable in its environment. The alcohol, the non-spermicidal lubricant, the florescent light, and the differing thaw temperatures were all variables, and all affected the sperm's viability in different ways. My hypothesis was that any and all variables in a sperm's environment will compromise its viability. My hypothesis was proven true.
Summary statement
Subjecting goat semen to a number of viabilty affecting factors.
Help received
Biology teacher supervised the observations in the microscope, mother helped set up the board.
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
ISEF · 2016
Viability of Bovine Semen, Phase III
ISEF · 2015
Viability of Bovine Semen, Phase II
ISEF · 2018
Increased Conception Rates by Regulating Temperature of Semen
CSEF · 2004
The Correlation of Sperm Life Expectancy to the Rotation of Semen
CSEF · 2004
Fun in the Sun: A Comparison of Fertilization Rates in L. pictus and S. purpuratus When Exposed to Ultraviolet Light
CSEF · 2016
How Now Black and White Cow
AJAS · 2020
Radiant Technology as Temperature Regulator in the Artificial Insemination Process
CSEF · 2005
Parthenogenesis: Optimizing Virgin Birth in Sea Urchins
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects