Under the Boardwalk: Starfish and Mussels
Overview
Objectives/Goals On pilings under Stearns Wharf and Goleta Pier, I always noticed that mussel beds were out of water for a long time at low tide and that very few mussels were lower. My goals were to see if sea stars are a major predator of mussels, if they eat more mussels more at deeper depths, and if mussels can even survive under water below the depth at low tide. I predicted that starfish would eat mussels a lot, that mussels in deeper water would be eaten more, and that mussels could live well underwater just as well as above. Methods/Materials Nine boards each with four clumps of living mussels were attached to wharf pilings so that the each clump of mussels was at a different, deeper depth in the water. Starfish were placed on or removed from the pilings for three treatments: plus treatment where three pilings had four starfish, the control treatment where there were either one or two starfish on three pilings (the natural number of starfish), and the minus treatment where there were no starfish on three pilings. Almost every day for 9 days, I counted the number of mussels that had been eaten at each depth. Results I found out that starfish are definitely the main predator of mussels. The number of mussels eaten was positively related to the number of starfish. I also found out that mussels can survive at deeper depths: where there were no starfish (the minus treatment), the mussels survived fine. The results of my depth test were not as clear. Mussels were eaten at all depths, although it seemed my hypothesis was true only in the plus treatment. Conclusions/Discussion I think that my experimental design may not have tested depth as well as it could have. Most of my mussels were still above water at low tide, but under water more than a regular mussel bed. If I had had longer boards so that some mussels were always under water, the test would have been more accurate. I still do not know why mussel beds are always situated high on pilings. On the pilings that I was using, I realized that there were lots of crabs. This helped to prove that sea stars are the one of the main predators of mussels because I could see that crabs were not eating the mussels, even in the minus treatment.
Summary statement
My project tested three hypotheses about whether starfish predation is important for the population and location of mussels.
Help received
Dad helped with the set-up and snorkeled with me when I was collecting data.
Competition history
- CSEF 2005
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
Que Moule
CSEF · 2006
Hangin' in the Harbor: A Study of Some Factors Affecting the Growth of Encrusting Marine Organisms
CSEF · 2011
Men with a Lot of Mussels
CSEF · 2004
Ecology of the Intertidal Zone: A Study of the Impact of Mussels on the Biodiversity of Conspicuous Biota
CSEF · 2012
Men with a Lot of Mussels Part 2: Revenge of the Turban Snails
CSEF · 2003
Between Pacific Tides
CSEF · 2007
Distribution of Western Snowy Plover Food at Sands Beach, Goleta
CSEF · 2003
Stick, Slime, and Slide: Turban Snail Survival Series
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects