The Triplet Fingerprint Study: Comparison of Fingerprint Patterns of Identical and Non-Identical Co-Triplets

CSEF · 2016 Mammalian Biology

Overview

Objectives/Goals Fingerprints develop while a person is within the womb. It is not known whether fingerprint patterns are due solely to environmental factors in the womb, or if there is a genetic component as well. Dizygotic triplets (two identical, one non-identical) can be used to determine the role of environmental versus genetic factors. The objective of this study is to determine if the fingerprint patterns from identical co-triplets are more similar than the non-identical co-triplets. Methods/Materials Mothers of dizygotic triplets obtained the fingerprints of each triplet, and mailed back the fingerprint cards and consent forms. The fingerprints were de-identified and examined by a fingerprint specialist, Mr. Kurt Kuhn. Each finger was analyzed, and assigned a National Crime Information Center (NCIC) Fingerprint Code. The data from each digit were compared between the identical co-triplets (A+B) and the non-identical co-triplets (A+C and B+C). The datasheet was submitted for statistical analysis to a statistician, Dr. Lisa Korst. Results Seven mothers of dizygotic triplets agreed to participate. All 21 children provided adequate quality fingerprints of all ten fingers. The number (average ± standard deviation) of fingers with the same pattern between the identical co-triplets (A and B) and the non-identical co-triplets (A and C; B and C) were as follows: A and B was 8.29 ± 1.25, A and C was 5.71 ± 2.29, and B and C was 6.14 ± 2.04. The identical co-triplets had significantly more fingerprint patterns in common compared to the non-identical pairs (p<0.05). Conclusions/Discussion The identical co-triplets had more fingerprint patterns in common than the non-identical co-triplets. Because all the triplets shared the same womb, but the identical co-triplet pairs had more common fingerprint patterns, this suggests that there is a genetic component to fingerprint patterns.

Summary statement

I showed that identical co-triplets had more fingerprint patterns in common than the non-identical co-triplets, thereby showing that there is a genetic component to fingerprint patterns.

Help received

I developed the scientific question. Mr. Kurt Kuhn (Retired, Beverly Hills Police Dept.) help me develop the fingerprint instruction sheet and analyze the fingerprints. Dr. Lisa Korst (Statistician, USC) helped with the statistical analysis. The mothers of the triplets were identified from the USC Perinatal Database.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2016 Mammalian Biology · Entry J1205

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google