The Stroop Effect: Validity and Gender Differences
CSEF · 2007 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals Does the process of reading the word affect the task of naming the color of the ink the font was written in and is there a gender difference? Methods/Materials o Stop watch with minutes, seconds, and milliseconds o Pen or pencil o Computer generated words for testing, in color o a computer generated chart to record my results o 82 subjects: 41 males & 41 females with minimum reading skills of Grade 3 1.First I decided that I want to test a total of 82 people with equal number of males and females. 2.I made 2 test charts and I tested and timed everyone with them using a stopwatch. For Test 1 the subjects read the words as written. For Test 2 they were asked to name the ink color of the fonts and not read the words. 3.I made sure that the subjects understood the task to be done. All questions were answered before the test was started. The subjects were tested in a comfortable environment. 4.Data recorded included the age and gender of the subjects and the time it took to read each chart. 5.Average time was calculated for both tests and rounded off to the second decimal place. 6.I made a graph to show the results. Results Test 1 was just reading the words. Test 2 was reading the color ink instead of the word. In Test 1 males averaged 7.99 seconds and performed better than females by 0.41 seconds. In Test 2 males averaged 20.59 seconds and performed better than females by 0.84 seconds. The average score for all subjects combined for Test 1 was 8.2 seconds and 21.01 seconds for Test 2. Conclusions/Discussion It was easier for people to read the word than just read the color. When you look at one of the words, you see both its color and its meaning. If those two pieces of evidence are in conflict, you have to make a choice. Because experience has taught that word meaning is more important than ink color, interference occurs while paying attention only to the ink color. The interference effect suggests you're not always in complete control of what you pay attention to. Contrary to my hypothesis males scored better for both tests but the difference was minimal and I do not think that it was a significant gender difference. A larger sample size may help in my future project.
Summary statement
The human brain works more efficiently for automatic processes than for controlled ones.
Help received
Father audited my calculations and graphs. Sister drove me to test subject's homes.
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2009
The Effect of Gender on the Stroop Effect
CSEF · 2004
Experience the Stroop! Does the Stroop Effect Change with Gender and Age?
CSEF · 2007
Stroop Effect
CSEF · 2004
The Stroop Effect
CSEF · 2009
What Conflicting Mental Tasks Reveal about Thinking: The Stroop Effect
CSEF · 2007
The Stroop Effect: Does Age Matter?
CSEF · 2015
The Impact of Warped Words on the Stroop Effect
CSEF · 2011
Stroop Artistry: Effect of Color Aptitude on the Stroop Test
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects