The Stroop Effect: Validity and Gender Differences

CSEF · 2007 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only)

Overview

Objectives/Goals Does the process of reading the word affect the task of naming the color of the ink the font was written in and is there a gender difference? Methods/Materials o Stop watch with minutes, seconds, and milliseconds o Pen or pencil o Computer generated words for testing, in color o a computer generated chart to record my results o 82 subjects: 41 males & 41 females with minimum reading skills of Grade 3 1.First I decided that I want to test a total of 82 people with equal number of males and females. 2.I made 2 test charts and I tested and timed everyone with them using a stopwatch. For Test 1 the subjects read the words as written. For Test 2 they were asked to name the ink color of the fonts and not read the words. 3.I made sure that the subjects understood the task to be done. All questions were answered before the test was started. The subjects were tested in a comfortable environment. 4.Data recorded included the age and gender of the subjects and the time it took to read each chart. 5.Average time was calculated for both tests and rounded off to the second decimal place. 6.I made a graph to show the results. Results Test 1 was just reading the words. Test 2 was reading the color ink instead of the word. In Test 1 males averaged 7.99 seconds and performed better than females by 0.41 seconds. In Test 2 males averaged 20.59 seconds and performed better than females by 0.84 seconds. The average score for all subjects combined for Test 1 was 8.2 seconds and 21.01 seconds for Test 2. Conclusions/Discussion It was easier for people to read the word than just read the color. When you look at one of the words, you see both its color and its meaning. If those two pieces of evidence are in conflict, you have to make a choice. Because experience has taught that word meaning is more important than ink color, interference occurs while paying attention only to the ink color. The interference effect suggests you're not always in complete control of what you pay attention to. Contrary to my hypothesis males scored better for both tests but the difference was minimal and I do not think that it was a significant gender difference. A larger sample size may help in my future project.

Summary statement

The human brain works more efficiently for automatic processes than for controlled ones.

Help received

Father audited my calculations and graphs. Sister drove me to test subject's homes.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2007 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only) · Entry J0604

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google