The Mighty Sugar Rocket
Overview
Objectives/Goals The purpose of my experiment was to see if I could make a functioning rocket using table sugar as fuel and to see which of three commonly available sugars, Sucrose, Fructose and Sucralose (Splenda) would work best at a fixed grain size. Methods/Materials Sucrose, Fructose, Sucralose (Splenda), Potassium Nitrate, Plain Paper, Bentonite Clay (Cat Litter), One 1/2 inch diameter Dowel, Scissors, Ruler, Tape, Fireworks Fuse, Drill (and one 9/64 inch drill bit), Hammer, Pasco Force Sensor, Force Sensor Apparatus and Software, Glue gun, Digital scale. First prepare the fuel mix, the ratio is 20 grams of KNO(3) to 11 grams of sugar. Combine the Potassium Nitrate and sugar and then grind them into a pretty fine powder using a coffee grinder for 5 seconds. Then grind your cat litter or clay into a powder. Now make a tube by cutting three strips of paper 1.5 inches wide and 11.5 inches long and wrap them into a tube with your dowel. Secure it with tape. Next hammer a Bentonite plug (take the clay powder and hammer it) in one side of the tube until you have a plug a little less than 1/2 inch long. Then fill with our KNO3 mixture and ram repeatedly until a bit less than 1/2 inch from top. Ram the rest with some more clay. And use your glue gun to secure it even more. Then take your drill and drill about 3/4 of the way through from the side you rammed with clay first. Secure the fuse. Next tape a cone to the other side. Then hook up to the force sensor apparatus, light the rocket. The data collected was analyzed using the DataStudio software to graph force/time. Results At the chosen grain size, the Sucrose rockets gave the most thrust but had a very short burn time; Fructose had a low thrust and medium burn time. Lastly, the artificial sweetener, Sucralose, had a very long burn time with extremely little thrust. Conclusions/Discussion My conclusion is that the type of sugar plays an important role in affecting the thrust of a Potassium Nitrate/Sugar rocket. The 'true' sugars (Sucrose and Fructose) in the presence of an oxidizer (KNO(3)) burned faster and were more suitable for rocket propulsion, while Sucralose (an artificial chlorinated sugar substitute) burned slowly and produced very little thrust. Rockets that use Sucrose seem to work better that those with Fructose or Sucralose.
Summary statement
What commonly available sugar is the best fuel for a homemade sugar rocket.
Help received
Mother and Father helped with the report and acquiring materials, PCS Physics teacher lent the Force sensor and apparatus, and Youtube for general instructions on how to build a sugar rocket.
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2018
The "Sweetest" Rocket Candy: Evaluating Sucrose, Glucose, and Fructose as Fuels for Sugar-Based Solid Rocket Motors
ISEF · 2018
KN-Sucrose Rocket Fuels
CSEF · 2018
Optimum Efficiency in Homemade Rocket Fuels
CSEF · 2015
The Effect of Rocket Fuel Ratios on Burn Rate
ISEF · 2022
Testing the Effects of Mixture Ratio on Rocket Impulse
CSEF · 2004
Generating and Calculating Water Density's Effect on Hydro-Rocket Flight
CSEF · 2014
Rocket Fuel Grains
CSEF · 2012
Carbon Catcher
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects