The Intentional Loss

CSEF · 2002 Mathematics & Software

Overview

Objectives/Goals The goal was to determine whether or not the intentional walk in baseball is a good idea or not, using two separate C++ programs. One program with the intentional walk, and one without. After that, the objective was determining how many more runs were gained/lost from doing this. Methods/Materials The Method used was a C++ program. Our materials, being general, consisted of a computer, C++ software, bored materials, text books, and the internet. Results Running each program 50 times, and finding the averages, we found that with the intentional walk the SF Giants gain over 3x's more runs. The program with the intentional walk's percentage of runs being 77%, and the program without the intentional walk's percentage of runs being 23% Conclusions/Discussion After running our project, we decided that using the intentional walk is a bad idea. The team up to bat gains a lot more runs if you use the intentional walk. It is a better idea to pitch to the batter and hope for a strike out.

Summary statement

We used two C++ programs to determine whether or not the intentional walk in baseball is a good idea.

Help received

Student helped with bored suggestions; Teacher suggested topic; Student helped with working out bugs in programs.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2002 Mathematics & Software · Entry S1208

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google