The Effects of Oral Antiseptics on Salivary Bacteria
CSEF · 2011 Microbiology (General) Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals The purpose of the investigation is to find which antiseptic [Mouthwash, Hydrogen Peroxide, or Toothpaste] inhibits oral bacterial growth most effectively. Methods/Materials The antiseptics used as independent variables were Mouthwash, Hydrogen Peroxide, and Toothpaste. The main bacteria grown were streptococci, as they are the most common species of salivary bacteria. Ten samples of saliva were collected with signed parental consent and diluted. One-half mL each of the diluted sample and antiseptic were mixed to yield a 1mL solution to be plated on Petrifilm. Positive and sterility controls were utilized and trials were run for the purpose of ensuring validity and reliability in the experiment. The positive controls were the samples that did not receive the antiseptic, while the sterility controls were the pure antiseptics and Distilled Water. The samples were incubated at 37 °C in an incubator to simulate the temperature of the bacteria#s living environment (the human body). After 24 hours of incubation, colonies were counted and recorded as CFU/mL. Results It was found that Hydrogen peroxide worked most effectively, yielding, on average, a 77% decrease in bacterial growth, compared to the positive control. Toothpaste had a 68% decrease and Mouthwash had a 63% decrease. Conclusions/Discussion The results obtained and analyzed support the hypothesis that Hydrogen Peroxide [H(2)O(2)] would be most effective at limiting salivary bacterial growth. The Hydrogen Peroxide product contains an active ingredient of 3% H(2)O(2), which, when coming in contact with organisms that contain the enzyme catalase, is split into H(2)O [water] and O(2) [oxygen gas]. However, some bacteria, including some in the oral cavity like streptococcus, do not contain catalase and, therefore, die in the presence of H(2)O(2).
Summary statement
This project focuses on the effects, specifically the average decrease in colony count (CFU/mL), of different oral antiseptics on the inhibition of colony growth of bacteria found within the oral cavity.
Help received
Parents bought material for display; Teacher, school, and 3M provided lab equipment; friend, Lisa, took pictures
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2007
Which Mouthwash and Ingredients Are Most Effective at Inhibiting Oral Bacteria?
CSEF · 2006
Brushing with Bacteria
ISEF · 2025
Evaluating Antimicrobial Efficacy of Commercial Mouthwashes
CSEF · 2019
Battling Bacteria
CSEF · 2016
Which Mouthwash Is More Effective in Killing Oral Bacteria?
CSEF · 2010
To Swish or Not to Swish? That Is the Question: The Effectiveness of Oral Hygiene in Reducing Bacteria in the Mouth
CSEF · 2002
Germ Warfare in the Oral Cavity
CSEF · 2017
Can Mouthwash Kill Germs Better When Compared to Toothpaste?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects