The Effects of Anthropogenic Biomes on Perceived Ground Shaking
CSEF · 2010 Earth & Environment (Senior Division Only) Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals Do anthropogenic biomes, or man-made environments, affect our perception of ground shaking? I hypothesize that: 1.Ground shaking reports, or Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) reports, are affected by the man-made environment, or anthropogenic biome, in which a person lives. 2.MMI reports are most influenced by highly populated urban anthromes because there is more destruction to witness. 3.Objective peak ground acceleration recordings are more accurate in predicting ground motion than MMI reports. Methods/Materials MMI reports were collected from 5 major earthquakes (7 < M < 7.9) that occurred in different global regions. 10 reports were collected from each earthquake. I used a Google Earth anthropogenic biome map, and MultiSpec, a satellite image analysis program, to find the anthropogenic distribution surrounding all 50 response sites. I normalized the data and ran multiple regression analyses to establish a relationship between MMI and anthropogenic biomes. I created a "General Model" by running an analysis on all 50 MMI reports, and five "Specific Models" by running analyses on MMI reports specific to their corresponding earthquake. All models were compared to the equation used by the USGS for shakemaps. Results The Village anthrome is directly related to MMI in the #General Model#, where F(x)=4.803-0.003(Distance)+0.028(Village). The #General Model# is directly related to and dependent on the village anthrome, while the #Specific Models# are inversely related to and dependent on a variety of anthromes. In the residual model for slope analysis, the #General Model#, #Specific Models#, and #USGS Model# had slopes within a 0.005 range of each other. Finally, a one-sample T-test comparing the #General Model# to the #USGS model# produced a P-value=0.002, suggesting that MMI reports are not significantly inflated. Conclusions/Discussion The T-test and slope analysis suggest that humans can accurately estimate ground shaking. Because the #General Model# is created from a globally-diverse pool of data, it may be used to estimate MMI from around the world; the nuances of a single global region will not greatly affect estimated MMI. The synergy between Village#s high population and total area may be why is it the most influential anthrome
Summary statement
My project aims to determine how our perception of seismic shaking is influenced by the anthropogenic biome, or man-made environment, in which we live.
Help received
Mr. Frost taught me statistics. Dr. Steve Chien introduced me to satellite image analysis.
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2010
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2010
Let's Get Ready to Rumble! A Comparative Study of Three Ground Materials' Stability/Safety During an Earthquake Scenario
CSEF · 2010
Soil and Structure Survival during Groundshaking
CSEF · 2010
The Effect of the Depth of a Focus on the Magnitude of an Earthquake
CSEF · 2018
Shake! Shake! Shake!
CSEF · 2005
Earthquakes! Which Soil Mixtures Reduce Damage? A Second Year Study
CSEF · 2015
Earthquake! Put Your Soil to the Test!
CSEF · 2007
The Investigation of Different Earth Materials on the Seismic Response of a Building Structure
CSEF · 2005
Earthquake: Building Destroyer
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects