The Effect of Urea on Archaea Microbes' Consumption of Gasoline
CSEF · 2011 Environmental Science
Overview
Objectives/Goals This purpose was to find a way to increase the rate that bacteria bio-remediate an area polluted with gasoline. Oil spills put 37 million gallons of oil in the ocean each year and some bacteria can consume it.It was hypothesized that the Archaea microbes mixed with 1.5 grams of urea would consume the most gas over an hour. Methods/Materials Materials used: beaker, graduated cylinders, stir plate, funnel, separation flask First 20 mL of water, 2 grams of bacteria, and either 0, 0.5, 1 or 1.5 grams of urea were mixed and put on a stir plate for 30 minutes. Then 20 mL of gasoline was added to this mixture for an hour. The mixture was then separated with a seperatory funnel. The amount of gasoline separated was recorded and the amount of bacteria and water was recorded. This procedure was repeated five times for each amount of urea. Results For zero grams of urea an average of 1.3 mL of gasoline was consumed with a 0.4 mL deviation and a 1.1% deviation. 0.5 grams of urea had an average of 0.6 mL of gas consumed, a 0.8 mL deviation and a 1.0% deviation. For 1.0 grams of urea 3.3 milliliters was the average gas consumed with 0.7 mL average deviation and 0.9% deviation. The 1.5 gram of urea trial#s average amount of gas consumed was 3.7 mL with a 1.1 mL average deviation and a 1.0% deviation. Conclusions/Discussion The hypothesis that the 1.5 grams of urea trials would consume most of the bacteria was supported. The 1.5 grams of urea trials had an average of 3.7 mL of gasoline consumed with a 1.1 mL average deviation and a 1.0% deviation. This was higher than the other three averages. When comparing 0.5 grams of urea trials and the 0 grams of urea trials the hypothesis was not supported. The 0.5 grams of urea trial had an average consumption of 0.6 mL while the zero grams of urea trials had an average of 1.3 mL of gasoline consumed. This data suggests that 0.5 grams of urea was not enough to stimulate the bacterial consumption of the oil. There is no pattern when adding more urea to the bacteria mixture, there is not a steady increase, only more gasoline was consumed. When comparing the bacteria and water, in order of increasing gasoline consumption, the data shows that more gasoline consumed yields more bacteria and water. Future research for this experiment could be to test the amount of urea or nitrogen to be added to an ocean environment to stimulate the oil consuming bacteria.
Summary statement
800 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE/ ECOLOGY
Help received
My science teacher helped with the experimental design
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2013
The Effects of Nutrients on the Microbial Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons
CSEF · 2008
The Advantage of Evolutionary Democracy: How Microorganisms Could Save Man's World
CSEF · 2014
The Effectiveness of Bioremediation with Different and Varying Concentrations of Nutrients
CSEF · 2002
Using Gas Chromatography to Analyze the Ability of O. anthropi, B. cereus and P. putida to Degrade Petroleum Oil
CSEF · 2016
Bioremediation: The Effect of Oil-Eating Bacteria on the Oxygen Production of Elodea canadensis
CSEF · 2004
The Effect of Ammoniated Cellulosic Material (Bagasse) on the Bioremediation of Oil Contaminated Water
CSEF · 2010
Investigating Bacteria on Oil Spots by Developing Bioremediation Measurement Methods
CSEF · 2012
The Effectiveness of Bioremediation with Different and Varying Concentrations of Nutrients
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects