The Effect of Precipitation on Nitrate Concentrations in San Francisquito Creek
CSEF · 2008 Environmental Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals The purpose of my project was to determine how the level of nitrate (NO3-), a common pollutant coming mainly from fertilizers, varied in different locations along Los Trancos-San Francisquito Creek. I was especially interested in how the nitrate levels varied before, during, and after a torrential rainstorm that dropped more than 4 inches of rain across the Bay Area on January 4th, 2008. Methods/Materials On January 3, I took 5 water samples along a 10 mile stretch of San Francisquito-Los Trancos Creek the day before the driving rains were forecasted. As heavy rains hit the Bay Area on January 4, I went out and collected 7 more samples, again working my way down the creek. On January 6, after the storm had passed and I had allowed enough time for immediate run off to drain down the creek, I collected 8 more water samples. After organizing my samples, I used a Horiba Ion Meter (NO3-) to measure the concentration of NO3- in each sample (ppm). Results - Water samples taken during the rains had 5 to 6 times more nitrates (100-200 ppm) than samples taken before the rains (15-30 ppm). - Sediment laden samples contained significantly higher nitrate levels than the same samples measured subsequently, after sediment was removed. - On every day I collected samples, nitrate levels generally increased through the town of Portola Valley, decreased through Stanford#s more rural property, and then increased through Palo Alto, an urban area. Conclusions/Discussion Since sediment laden samples had more nitrate than the same samples without sediment, I conclude that much more nitrate is contained within the soil itself, than the amount of nitrate dissolved in the water. If one can filter out the sediment in a heavily nitrate-polluted creek, many of the negative effects of high amounts of nitrate can be mitigated. Since the samples taken in the rural, Stanford area had lower amounts of nitrate than the samples in urban areas, I conclude that human presence, whether it be on a Portola Valley farm or in a concrete apartment building in Palo Alto, is the main cause for nitrate pollution. Soil that is generally untouched by humans can not contribute large amounts of nitrate to a water system.
Summary statement
The goal of my project was to determine how the nitrate concentrations in Los Trancos/San Francisquito Creek varied at different locations along the creek and also to see how these concentrations were affected by a torrential (4+ inches) ra
Help received
My dad drove me to each sample location I had selected, and my family supplied the funds to purchase my nitrate meter. The experiment#s design, inspiration, and execution were all conducted by me. I also consulted Alan Launer, at the Stanford Center of Conservation and Biology, who helped verify my data
Competition history
- CSEF 2008
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
To Drink or Not To Drink Cayucos Creek Water
CSEF · 2004
Water Quality along Saratoga Creek
CSEF · 2010
The Effects of Rainfall on the Composition of Creek Water and the Correlation Between These Effects and Lining Soil Comp
CSEF · 2012
How Do Nitrate Levels Along the Salinas River Compare to Non-Farm Tributary Water?
CSEF · 2003
Water Pollution Outbreak?
CSEF · 2006
Modeling the Effects of Storm Drain Pollutants on San Fransquito Creek using Water Quality Studies and Toxicity Testing
CSEF · 2009
Do Wetlands Effectively Remove Nitrates from San Diego Creek Water Before Discharging into the Ocean?
CSEF · 2007
What's in Your River? Nitrates, Phosphates, Ammonia, Oh My!
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects