The Effect of Materials on the Amplitude and Experience of Sound
CSEF · 2007 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only) Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals Experiments were conducted to determine the differences between the sounds made by instruments constructed from different materials. Attempts were made to discover what effect changing the soundboard of an instrument has on its sound by graphing the amplitude on a computer software program and by how those differences are perceived by the human mind. Methods/Materials Experiments were conducted by recording one instrument with interchangeable tops, referred to as soundboards, on a high fidelity recording with Pro Tools software program. This included a visual frequency graph enabling comparison of graphed characteristics to acoustic attributes determined by a questionnaire. Applicant made experimental string instrument resembling a Banjo (zinc washbucket, axe handle, tamborine, shelf bracket, common and musical hardware) with interchangable soundboards. Materials List: (Experiment) Shure KSM44 microphone, microphone cable, microphone stand, Shure M367 Six Input Portable Mixing audio processor, Macintosh computer with ProTools and iPhoto software, Bose Triport OE headphones, instrument with interchangeable tops (wooden top, metal top, acrylic top, Remo top, skin top,) tape, digital camera, tripod, paper, printer, socket wrench. (Questionnaire) Pen, Paper, computer with Microsoft Word, CD recordings of same music played on the instrument with each different soundboard, head phones and portable CD player. Results Amplitude Peak Statistics were recorded, graphed and analyzed. The acrylic top had the fastest attack and was the loudest of all the different soundboards. The acrylic top stayed mainly in the high/mid range and had the highest amplitude.The metal soundboard had a quiet and slow attack that was the quietest of all of the tops. The metal stayed in the high range and low amplitude. Questionaire responses were recorded and graphed. Wood was voted most appealing because it had the strongest midrange tones and amplitude. Conclusions/Discussion The wood soundboard#s amplitude was in the midrange and had the most #appealing# sound of the five. The results suggested that the middle range of tone and sound are what people think of as musical. The material of the top, or soundboard, of the instrument had a major effect on its sound. The effect of materials on sound, and what the human ear identifies as these differences are discussed.
Summary statement
This project compares the objective and subjective qualities of sound.
Help received
Mother helped shop for materials, assist with power tools . Professional music editor recorded instrument at home recording studio.
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2010
Investigation of Sound Transmission of Variable Frequencies through Materials of Variable Densities
CSEF · 2017
How We Perceive Sound
CSEF · 2014
Acoustic Insulation: Propagation and Reflection of Sound Waves of Various Frequencies for Different Materials
CSEF · 2007
Wood It Matter? A Comparison of Solid Body Electric Guitars
CSEF · 2013
Accoustical Properties of a Musical Instrument
CSEF · 2005
What Material Makes a More Resonant Acoustic Instrument Soundboard?
CSEF · 2004
Catch a Wave: Choosing the Right Soundboard
CSEF · 2006
The Science of Music
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects