The Effect of Mass Flux on the C* Efficiency of Aluminized Grains in an N(2)O-Fed Hybrid Rocket Motor
CSEF · 2002 Aerodynamics/ Hydrodynamics
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective was to determine if the combustion efficiency of a N2O-fed, aluminized hybrid rocket motor is dependant on the propellant mass flux inside the motor ports. Methods/Materials After a substantial amount of research, a 300 lb thrust, 3.5 inch diameter, 2-port hybrid rocket motor was designed, machined, cast with fuel, assembled, safety tested, fired, and then analyzed. The operating parameters of the motor were designed to start at a high mass flux (1.0 lb/sec/in^2) and end at a low mass flux (0.15) in a single test. The motor was instrumented for N2O tank weight and pressure, motor thrust, and chamber pressure. Data was collected during the burn and analyzed afterwards. All of the motor components were scratch-built from aluminum tube and plate, stainless steel, and graphite bar stock. The fuel was cast with a rubber binder and (10% by weight) 3-micron aluminum powder. The stand was welded steel, and the feed system was assembled from a stainless tank, purchased valves and fittings, and salvaged high-pressure hose. Results Motor performance exceeded my expectations and ran smoothly over the whole range of mass flux. The injector flowed more N2O than anticipated, resulting in a higher thrust (360 lbf) and higher than planned, initial mass flux (1.3). Nevertheless, my combustion, or C* efficiency, averaged about 84% over the whole burn, despite having an injector starting to burn through at 1.5 seconds. The injector did not completely fail, and the motor continued to burn well until the end of the 4-second burn. Conclusions/Discussion From the post-test analyses, I can conclude that C* efficiency, good motor stability, and high performance is more a function of proper motor and injector design than mass flux.
Summary statement
My project showed that hybrid rocket motors can be operated at high propellant mass flux, delivering high fuel burn rate, high performance (C* efficiency), and stable motor chamber pressure, provided the injector and motor are well designed
Help received
My father answered my questions and helped me anchor the thrust stand into the concrete pad at the test site. My mother helped me design the display board.
Awards (1)
- Category Award
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
Design, Analysis, and Optimization of Solid Fuel Rocket Engines
CSEF · 2003
Development and Utilization of a Model to Predict Rocket Velocity, Acceleration, Altitude, and Distance
ISEF · 2018
Investigating the Effects of Propellant Mass Flow Rate and a Swirl Ring on the Efficiency of a Magnetoplasmadynamic Thruster
ISEF · 2021
Effect of Geometric Manipulation on the Main Combustion Chamber of a Full- Flow Staged Rocket Engine
ISEF · 2023
A New Rocket Nozzle Design To Improve Performance at High Altitudes
CSEF · 2014
Rocket Fuel Grains
CSEF · 2015
The Effect of Rocket Fuel Ratios on Burn Rate
ISEF · 2022
Designing and Fabricating a Vortex Aerospike Rocket Engine
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects