The Amazing Power of OLEDs
CSEF · 2012 Materials Science (Junior Division Only) Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals The goal of this study was to see how the thickness of the emissive layer affects the amount of light output of an Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED), and to see how the chemical used as the Hole Transport Layer (HTL) affects the light output. Methods/Materials Glass coated with a common anode called ITO, was cleansed in water and isopropanol. The 4 drops of a common HTL called PEDOT:PSS was pipetted onto the cleansed glass, while the glass was on the spin coater. The glass was spun at 1290 rpm. The glass was dried with a hot plate and then an emissive layer called Red Diamond 620s was spun coated on, and then dried. The cathode template was stuck on, and then a common cathode called Gallium Indium Eutectic was pipetted on. The cathode cover was stuck on, and then a little bit of HTL and emissive layer was taken off using acetonitrile. The power supply was attached to the anode and the cathode and the power supply was turned on. Measurements of photoresistance were taken using a multimeter hooked up to a light dependent resistor. Measurements were taken every 30 seconds for 10 minutes. Results When the spin speed of the emissive layer was increased from 1290 rpm to 2448 rpm there was a 76% decrease in light output. When the HTL was changed from Low Conductivity PEDOT:PSS to High Conductivity PEDOT:PSS there was a 12.4% decrease in light output. One of the devices made with the Low Conductivity PEDOT:PSS as the HTL did not turn on at 6V, the voltage used to turn on the other OLEDs. None of the devices made without an HTL turned on. Conclusions/Discussion 1290 rpm is a better candidate for spin speed when spin coating the emissive layer because it had a 76% higher light output than the devices with emissive layers spun at 2448 rpm. The High Conductivity PEDOT:PSS is a better candidate as an HTL because more devices worked for the High Conductivity PEDOT:PSS compared to the Low Conductivity PEDOT:PSS, even though the High Conductivity PEDOT:PSS had a 12.4% lower light output than the Low Conductivity PEDOT:PSS.
Summary statement
OLED devices were made by varying the spin speed when spin coating the emissive layer, also various chemicals were used for the Hole Transport Layer, and the effect on light output was measured.
Help received
Stephen Clemmet # CEO of Polymertronics, provided OLED components and advice on OLEDs. Bay View Optics provided ITO coated glass and PET substrates. Dad helped with editing and was the Adult Hazards Supervisor. Mom helped with backboard and editing.
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2012
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2010
Nanocrystalline Dye-Sensitized Solar Energy II
CSEF · 2016
The Effect of Organic Dye on Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Efficiency
CSEF · 2019
Developing Metal Electrodes to Replace ITO in Organic Thin Film Solar Photovoltaics
CSEF · 2011
The Effect of Various Colored Natural Dyes on Energy Output of Home-Made Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cells
CSEF · 2017
Accessible Solar Cells: Creating an Anthocyanin Powered Solar Cell
CSEF · 2018
The Photovoltaic Effect: Maximizing the Efficacy of Solar Panels through Variation in Exposure and Wavelength
CSEF · 2010
The Effect of Various Plant Dyes on the Efficiency of a Dye Sensitized Solar Cell and Comparison to a Silicon Solar Cell
CSEF · 2015
The Photovoltaic Effect
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects