T.R.E. Method of Forestry
CSEF · 2011 Mathematics & Software
Overview
Objectives/Goals My investigative question is which small sample surveying sampling method has the best representation of a larger whole population to manage the growth of trees; transect surveys, radial surveys, equilateral surveys, or all 3 combined? A forest is too large to count every tree. Sample surveys of smaller areas may need to accurately represent a much larger population area. My question examines what percentage of the larger population can be represented by smaller transect, radial, and equilateral survey samples. With previous knowledge about radials and transects, I decided to design a new method, called equilaterals. This method expands in the forest at a 90 degree angle. Methods/Materials I constructed 4 models of 24 scaled down #hectares#. Each hectare represents 2.4 acres or 10,000 sq. meters. I then labeled them. On model 1 I drew 2 transects, 2 radials, and 2 equilaterals. On model 2, I drew 6 transects. On model 3, I drew 6 radials. On model 4, I drew 6 equilaterals. Each representative sampling area was equal to 1 hectare in size. I randomly created a forest of 200 trees per model. I determined the mean average of each smaller sample, and compared them to means of the larger populations. I determined validity with a t-test in each case at a 95% confidence level. Results Percentage of small samples that met the T-test @ 95% confidence level. Model 1: Combination of all three sampling methods 21.20% Model 2: Transect sampling method 29.68% Model 3: Radial sampling method 8.48% Model 4: Equilateral sampling method 76.34% Conclusions/Discussion Surprisingly, the equilateral methodology had by far, the best representation of the larger whole population at 76% accuracy. This is surprising as the surface area represented was equal in all sampling methods.
Summary statement
This project mathematically examines the validity of three sampling methods used in field biology studies.
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2012
A Comparison of Small Population Transect and Radial Sampling Methods with Larger Whole Populations Sampling
CSEF · 2004
A Comparison of Transect and Radial Sampling Methods
CSEF · 2008
Transect Sampling: A Statistical Model Demonstration of Accuracy in Forestry Management
CSEF · 2004
A Statistical Comparison of Radial and Transect Sampling Methods in a Hypothetical 2-Dimensional Model
CSEF · 2004
Comparing Methods of Biostatistical Sampling
CSEF · 2015
Investigating the Accuracy of the Method Foresters Use to Estimate the Radial Growth Rate of Trees
CSEF · 2005
Statistical Validity of Environmentally Variable Small Population Data Bases
CSEF · 2014
Investigating the Accuracy of the Current Method Used to Measure Growth Rate on Redwood Trees
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects