Structural Protection in Wildfire Hazard Areas
CSEF · 2006 Materials Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals To determine which fire retarding treatment would best protect a structure from wildfires. Methods/Materials I constructed boxes to test the effectiveness of different fire retardants. I set a torch at three different temperature settings to simulate wildfire temperatures of 260°C, 540°C and 815°C. I put each box into the flame and measured the time it took the treatment to fail (catch fire). Results The untreated boxes failed much quicker than any of the other treatments. The treatment of water worked much better than no treatment at the lowest temperature with an average of 238 seconds for water, as compared to 29 seconds. At the higher temperatures, especially 815°C, the water evaporated off very quickly and failed after 32 seconds as compared to the untreated boxes which failed after 22 seconds. The treatment of foam was slightly more effective than water in all of the tests. Foam#s time to failure decreased significantly at 815°C, but still did better than water taking an average of 23 seconds longer to fail. The sodium polyacrylate gel failed after a far longer amount of time than any of the other treatments. At 260°C gel took 695 seconds to fail as compared to foam which took an average of 267 seconds, the second longest lasting treatment. Conclusions/Discussion Both foam and gel are nontoxic compounds which work better than water at keeping structures from burning. Foam worked better than water in all temperatures, but sometimes only by a little. The gel protected my test boxes much longer than any other treatment. I have concluded that the best thing to protect a structure from a wildfire would be sodium polyacrylate gel.
Summary statement
I tested three different fire retardants: water, class A foam, and sodium polyacrylate gel to see which would be most effective in protecting a house from wildfires.
Competition history
- CSEF 2006
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2008
Fire Prevention by Water Retention
CSEF · 2009
We Can Stop the Fire!
CSEF · 2011
All Fired Up!
CSEF · 2016
Wild for Wildfire Safety
CSEF · 2010
Fire Away: A Comparison of Supplemental Fire Protection Methods for Wood Sided and Fiber Cement Sided Homes
CSEF · 2018
How Can We Protect Homes from Wildfires?
CSEF · 2015
Saving the Lives of Wildland Firefighters with a Hydrated Polyacrylate Fire Shelter
CSEF · 2013
Combust This: Can Wood Preservatives Increase the Effectiveness of Fire Retardants?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects